Gadgets, Technology, Diet, Nutrition, Audio Books, and Random Thoughts

iPod, therefore I am

Filed under: Technology, gadgets, etc. — Tags: , , , , , — Levi @ 9:42 am September 1, 2003

iPodYes, I have joined the faithful hordes of those who have one of those shiny white icons called iPod For those who have been living under a rock for the last couple of years, this device primarily built to play audio, but does so much more. My iPod “saga” is probably much more interesting to me than it would be to anyone else, so let’s just say that I was able to get a large discount on the thing through a special offer on Audible.com, but once ordered, the thing was perpetually backordered. I finally broke down and went to an Apple store and bought one because not so much because I couldn’t take the waiting (I have been “waiting” to get one of these for many months, if not more) but more the uncertainty of when it would arrive – the last estimate I got was 5 weeks away!

For those who are new to iPods, like myself, the vast commercial and social entity surrounding the thing seems a bit intimidating. The iPod itself is designed (like much of Apple’s products) with ease of use and simplicity in mind. Perhaps because of this, the documentation that is offered is fairly basic. There are three excellent resources for iPod owners that I have come across, iPodLounge, iPoding, and iPodHacks.These sites offer news, FAQ’s, and large discussion forums filled with info. But, of course all this information is a bit daunting and the FAQ’s actually don’t seem to add much to Apple’s own very basic info. I found myself actually pining for a good old-fashioned device called a book!

iPod: The Missing Manual to the rescue. There are a few books out there on iPods. “iPod: The Missing Manual” is probably the newest one, although another, “Secrets of the iPod, Third Edition”, has just been updated and re-released. The Missing Manual is a series from O’Reilly, the venerated computer book publisher.Their computer books are excellent, albeit often very much geared towards programmers as opposed to beginners. The Missing Manual series, however, seems not to have such a technical approach. I found the iPod: The Missing Manual a very easy read. In fact I read the entire book yesterday while ripping my CD collection. Of course, much of the book is divided into talking about Windows vs. Mac. This isn’t really because of the iPod itself, since the latest iPods come out of the box compatible with either and act virtually identical whether you use them with a PC or Mac. The differences come with the myriad of computer programs that help you do things with your iPod, including most importantly the ones that let you rip MP3’s, manage your music collection, and transfer this to your iPod. Although, according to the book, the program Mac folk have been using for years to do this, called “iTunes,” Apple has promised to put out a Windows version by the end of 2003. Up until then, Windows users use MusicMatch. In case your local bookseller doesn’t have the Missing Manual book, there are a couple other ones out there which probably are just as good, including “How to Do Everything With Your iPod“.

Some of my friends and family would ask me why I wanted an iPod so much. After all, these things aren’t cheap! There are other devices that do similar things for a good deal less, or do a lot more for the same price. But the one thing these other devices don’t have is compatibility with the audio book service Audible.com, which I subscribe to. Of course iPod fans will also talk about how well they are designed, from their outer shell to their user interface. And while design (especially in a user interface) is important, I sometimes wonder if it worth the very large premium that Apple charges for it. Then again there is also the huge community of both iPod users and third-party vendors who produce both software and hardware for it. No other device has this kind of userbase, especially one so fanatical! Maybe this is due to the fact that the iPod is made by a very large, solid company (one who engenders a great deal of loyalty via its other products) backing it and that it was the first MP3 player out there to use hard drive technology to enable it to store gigabytes worth of songs. Maybe if another large company like Microsoft or Sony got into the fray, the iPod would really have some competition. Competition is almost always good for the consumer, but iPod fans (fanatics) seem to have done fine without another juggernaut out there.

It also turns out that the iPod is useful in ways I hadn’t even realized. I can actually use the thing as a portable hard drive, although I will probably need to get a USB cable to make that feature useful. Also, I can actually synchronize all my Outlook contacts, calendar events, to-do’s, and notes onto the iPod using a handy program called iPodSync (there are others as well). Who’d a thunk? And here my phone, Danger’s Sidekick, a device that was built with personal information management options from the ground up still doesn’t have a synching option a year after they promised one! I suppose this is mainly because the iPod is a bit more hackable than the Sidekick!

Seeing how well portable hard drive technology works with the iPod makes me wonder why it hasn’t been implemented more often not just for listening to music but for PDA’s like the PalmPilot or PocketPC. I suppose one might argue that the 32-64MB that these devices typically hold (along with an additional up to 512MB or more through an external smartmedia, SD, MMC, or memory stick card), is plenty for almost any use. But then again, multimedia players are showing up now that processor capability has increased. You can play MP3’s and even video. So why not have some of the vast storage that one might find on a player that is built ONLY to play audio and/or video? Or maybe that’s just the annoying convergist (?) in me? It’s funny, I used to take the approach, since this is what you see in the world of hi-fi audio/video equipment, that It’s better to have a single device devoted to a single function. It’s seems logical that if this is the case, the quality that’s delivered will be much greater since the unit can specialize. But when the whole object is portability, this approach doesn’t work of course! It’s true that combination devices usually are not nearly as usable as ones that focus on a particular use. But who wants to carry around a PDA, a phone, a walkman, a GPS, and portable device for getting online?

In any case, I can see now how the iPod had developed a following. I still think it could be cheaper, but then perhaps this is one reason for the following – people have spent such a big chunk of money on theirs that they feel they need to cherish it and devote much more attention and time to it than if they had picked it up for cheap. I got the middle range of the newer models, one that has 15 gigabytes, a number that would have been unimaginable when I got my first computer hard drive about 13 years ago, one that was a mear 200GB and was probably ten times the size and weight of my new shiny iPod! But already I am thinking I should have gotten the much larger 30GB model so that I can not only fit my entire music collection and a dozen audio books, but also my fiancée’s music collection and a couple dozen more audio books to boot! But I suppose if I wait a year Apple will come out with a new iPod that holds 60GB and plays video, so perhaps I should wait?

Evernote lets you save all the interesting things you see online into a single place. Access all those saved pages from your computer, phone or the web. Sign up now or learn more. It's free!

 

Caffein Culture and Wifi Wanderings

Filed under: Journal & Blog,Technology, gadgets, etc. — Tags: , , , , , , — Levi @ 4:07 pm August 23, 2003

My caffein-addled brain is on a tear. I often get this way, even when I’m just drinking decaf. Something about coffee sets my mind in motion. Caffeine just adds some speed. I have been out all morning (and part of the afternoon) wondering my neighborhood of Adams Morgan in DC as well as a bit south into the Dupont Circle neighborhood. It is the perfect day to do this. There is no humidity, it is warm, but with a nice breeze. Perfectly blue sky and sunny. It’s also a Sunday morning where lots of other folks like me are out just enjoying a lazy Sunday before the workweek starts again tomorrow. If only life were a perpetual series of Sundays like this. I could get used to it. Then again, experience seems to show that days like this have such value because they are not so ordinary. If every day were like this, perhaps it would just be boring. Or at least we’d take it for granted much more. I remember a year or two ago there were big swaths of time during the spring and/or summer where the weather was just as perfect as today. I would take every opportunity to be outside. I’m sure there were days where I stayed inside despite not having to, but I do remember always thinking, “Take advantage of it!”

Anyway, I’m reading a book on espresso which is quite good, but which I’ll post a review when I’m done (hopefully within a couple of weeks). The ability to sit at a sidewalk cafe, people watch, read, surf the Internet, and even make a little small talk with strangers next to you, is something that is so nice. I’m a fairly shy person and so have spent a lot of my weekends going to public places like these because it feels like although I may not be a part of some social event, I am at least part of the world at large if even as an observer. At least I’m not shut up in some small apartment watching the NOT Real World on TV. Even now that I am getting married, I still enjoy the opportunity to get out on my own (my fiancée is away this weekend) and soak in the sensations of neighborhood life without any time constraints, or need to focus all one’s attention on one thing.

Speaking of caffein, I have the odd site of a giant automated convenience store or vending machine right near where I live in Adams Morgan. Up until today I had only used it once – to rent a dvd just for the heck of it. But they have all kinds of items from eggs and milk to contraceptives and more. Walking by it today I decided to take a quick look since I haven’t really looked at it carefully since they redesigned and restocked it several months ago. I happened upon a product that I’d never seen before which I felt I had to try. It was sugar-free Red Bull. Red Bull is one of these so-called “energy drinks” which mixes caffein, sugar and perhaps other stimulants, and give one a “jolt of energy” – since our lives aren’t already fast-paced enough, huh? But being a low-carber, I don’t beverages with sugar. Actually I swore off even diet sodas a couple of years ago because the carbonation and other chemicals they put in them are not very good for you and besides probably hinder weight loss. But sugar free Red Bull I just had to try. I’ve heard Red Bull is horrible tasting. I doubt I will ever drink this stuff again, but I thought I could at least try it. I’ll wait till tomorrow morning though, as I’m already sufficiently caffeinated for the next 16 hours!

Wifi devicesI mentioned surfing the Internet, so I thought I’d elaborate a little on this. I have a phone that lets me browse the web, send and receive email, and send and receive instant messages as long as I can receive a signal (which is often very easy in the middle of DC, but sometimes surprisingly fickle). Although the screen is small, black and white, and won’t let me visit just any page, it will do in a snap. I eagerly await the day when I upgrade to a device that has a slightly larger color screen that has fewer limitations in what pages it can load, has a faster speed, and can even do wifi. Wifi, for those not familiar, is another word for wireless networking. You see this mostly in laptops, but an increasing number of smaller devices like Palmpilots, PocketPC’s, etc. are starting to incorporate the capability with varying degrees of success. Of course you can also put a wireless network card in a full-blown desktop PC and thus avoid having to deal with all the ugly wires.

Anyway, I do have a laptop and will take this out to do some work (I do freelance web development in addition to my fulltime job as a web developer) since it’s often more fun – although usually also more distracting – than sitting at home. There are a bunch of different wifi networks out there that provide services at various locations. I have a subscription with one of the largest of these, the so-called Hotspot service from Tmobile. Since my phone is through them, I pay a discounted rate of $20/month. I haven’t tried to break this down to a per-minute or per-hour cost yet. My guess is that since I’ve had my laptop, I’ve spent an average of maybe 15 hours per month give or take, which would mean this costs about $1.33/hour. This compares favorably to all the other networks out there, except ones that are free of course! There are free access points around, but I’ve heard about more in New York (Bryant Park and Union Square) than I have in DC.

I wonder if eventually we will see public wifi access points in every city (and perhaps even small towns) that are sponsored by taxpayer money? Probably the user base of such services is not quite there yet, although given a few years we may see every phone, laptop, pda, and even desktop computer that is manufactured have a built in wifi card. Also, most wifi networks are still using the older protocol of 802.11b, which has a range of around 150 ft and a speed of 11mbps (really 4mps in the real world). 802.11g, a newer standard introduced last year as a stopgap before a real next-generation standard is agreed to, has not quite taken off, despite being backward compatible with 802.11b. This newer standard offers 55mbps (around 20mbps in the real world) and longer ranges. By the way, MBPS stands for Mega (million) Bits Per Second. Modems currently top out around 56K, or 56 Kilo (thousand) bits per second, so 4mps is still about 70 times faster than a 56K modem! But speed in and of itself, while nice, is not the be all and end all, at least for me right now. When people start using their devices to hold impromptu video teleconferences, or just phone conversations, or to download and watch live HDTV or dvd-quality movies or tv shows, etc., then speed will definitely become a factor. But for now speed FOR ME is secondary to range. With the next generation standards, we could see ranges of 1/4 of a mile or more for a single access point. What this means is that a city could buy 100 or 200 access points (perhaps a little more for really large cities), or smaller towns could buy a half dozen and voilà, instant access for everyone! So, how would this work? It could be done on a federal basis that would ensure access everywhere (even along lonely highways in very sparsely populated areas of Nevada or Wyoming), or it would all be on a local or state basis. States could pay for it via taxes, and perhaps could charge non-residents extra and make some additional money. In addition to tourism dollars, why not make some cybertourism dollars? I don’t know, maybe that type of system would be too complex. But would letting the federal gov’t institute it make for very slow progress as new technologies develop? Or would it simply be an area that people don’t want the feds involved in now that they are already taking away more of our privacy? Private industry will make things happen much faster, we will just have to pay more. Maybe the state/local plan would be a good compromise, but then again more rural/poorer areas would not be served as well..

If you would like to look at what kind of establishments around you offer wifi, here are just a few of the many sites to check out:

Here are a few wifi commercial (read not free) networks aside from Tmobile’s mentioned above:

Evernote lets you save all the interesting things you see online into a single place. Access all those saved pages from your computer, phone or the web. Sign up now or learn more. It's free!

 

Convergence Ramblings

Filed under: Technology, gadgets, etc. — Tags: , , , , — Levi @ 11:02 am July 6, 2003

Gizmodo has a few references to phones (from British Telecom, Ericson and Verizon, and Motorola and NEC) that are being developed by various companies that are to have Wifi capability and even designed to do voice over IP. For those who don’t know what this is, it’s just a way to transmit your voice that is not exactly new. Such programs as Microsoft NetMeeting have had this capability for a long time (along with video). I’ve used this technology and was never very impressed with the quality, although perhaps they have made strides with it in the last couple of years. I just wonder if it will be more or less reliable than your average GSM (or CDMA) voice connection. GSM and CDMA do something very similar in that they convert your voice into zeros and ones transmit them through the air to a cell tower which converts them to analog and then sends them along a landline to the other end. Or at least that’s what I think happens. The main difference I see with VoIP is that it does it faster because Wifi is generally on at least a 300kbps line, sometimes a lot higher. Whereas most cell phones still haven’t gotten much past 64kbps. So theoretically voice quality would be better, but then I’m not sure how efficient VoIP is with compressing voice so that it doesn’t take up as much bandwidth as it might uncompressed.

Anyway, these phones aren’t ONLY VoIP, but a combinations of VoIP and GSM or CDMA. Since Wifi networks are still not as ubiquitous (or have the range) of cellular networks, having a VoIP-only phone wouldn’t be very practical! When traveling you’d have to find the nearest Starbucks just to make a call! I’m not even that excited about VoIP. Maybe in a few years it will be the dominant means of making calls when there are Wifi access points on every corner of every block, or sooner if they can increase the range of current (or future) Wifi protocols from the current 300-ft max.

What does interest me much more, though, is just the fact that these phones will have both Wifi and cellular capability. So you will be able to access your email, the web, instant messaging, etc. at pretty high speeds whenever you are near an access point, but you will be able to do the same things, albeit at lower speeds, even when you’re far from any. At least that’s the theory. Whether the devices being built will be able to do this in an elegant way, that’s a whole other issue. I suppose if they are built from the ground up, or have an OS that is modified to account for these two different modes of communications (such as a PocketPC Phone Edition or PalmOS5 or Symbian with the proper hooks), we may have some hope.

It does look like there is a concerted effort in the direction of creating Cell/Wifi phones though, which is great. Of course now that this may be a reality relatively quickly, I can’t help but think of yet other capabilities I would want to throw onto such a device. First there’s GPS. We have just seen the first PDA-Phone with a built-in GPS receiver from Motorola. It’s not actually out yet, and according to the info it’s unclear whether the SD slot is just SD or SDIO (SDIO being necessary for hooking up an SD Wifi card). If it is SDIO, then this might be the most all-inclusive device for a while! The other item on the wish list is a hard drive. Yes, this will subtract battery power and so maybe having a ton of solid-state memory would be a compromise, but solid-state memory is extremely pricey! Lexar’s new 4GB compact flash card is $1,500! Compare that to 200GB hard drives that you can get now for only $100 or so with rebates. Of course notebook-sized and/or external hard drives are more expensive, but not nearly as much as solid state! Why do I want such storage? Well, to go along with the potential multimedia capabilities of the phone – to be able to play video transferred from a TIVO or just display the hundreds or thousands of pictures I’ve taken/scanned. Also, what about my entire MP3 collection? Now we’re really talking convergence. While we’re at it, throw in some TV reception (although I won’t ask for satellite TV just yet, or HDTV), which apparently is a feature that Samsung is creating for the South Korean market. Finally, there’s satellite reception – not for TV but for the phone itself. We have already seen this dual cell/satellite phone capability via the infamous Thuraya sattelite phones that were banned in the War on Iraq.

When will all these technologies merge into one unit? Probably not anytime very soon. But the fact that so many of them are already under development, albeit not in one complete package but rather partial ones, bodes well. My prediction (don’t quote me!), is that we’ll have something with most if not all of the technologies I’ve listed above in a single device within five years. Maybe as little as two. Then again, in two years (let alone five) I’m sure there will be all these new capabilities (mini-hd-dvd’s, wifi/satellite-video-on-demand, holographic projection, and electrode stimulation?) popping up that we don’t even have today which I will then be crying for inclusion into the convergence device. Guess I’ll never be satisfied…

Evernote lets you save all the interesting things you see online into a single place. Access all those saved pages from your computer, phone or the web. Sign up now or learn more. It's free!

 
« Newer Posts