Twelve Black Code Monkeys

I know the entries haven’t exactly been spilling out lately. Chock that up to parenthood I guess, which tends to take up most of the free time at home I used to devote to blogging, and the time that is left over is just an opportunity to catch up on sleep!

However, I have been up to some other things besides parenting, specifically as it relates to what I am listening to these days vis-à-vis digital audio. First a quick bit of history:

I got involved with audio books and what might be called a forerunner of podcasting (at least in terms of subscribing to feeds of magazine, newspaper and radio shows) about 6.5 years ago when I subscribed to Audible.com. I’ve listened to a lot of books and other programming, but after I got involved with my now wife back in late 2001, the listening slowed somewhat.

Then in late 2004, I started listening to what was then the very new phenomenon of podcasts. Because there were so many, they completely pushed out my audio book listening. Sure, I could have alternated. But as kind of a news junky, it’s hard to start reading history books when there’s lots of current event non-fiction or news articles, etc. I also have this tendency to want to complete lists of listening, and the method that seems easiest is to do the shortest things first, thus getting through a large number of list items right away. Unfortunately with podcasts, they just keep piling up! You can subscribe to just a couple, but I was subscribed to 20-30, and even though these were on average a small fraction of the length of an unabridged audio book (and also that I was speeding these up by 50% or so), I was still barely keeping my head above water. All this time my audio books sat dormant, and continued to pile up. I was also spending a considerable amount of time just doing the processing that would speed these podcasts up, organize them in the proper folders, downloading them and transferring them to my iPod, etc.

Back last December I finally axed my Audible account because I simply wasn’t listening to books at that point, and didn’t want yet another growing pile of content that I was ignoring. Several months later, though, I took advantage of an offer to become a member again for $10/year with a free audio book offer. There was a book that had just come out, Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dillema, that had just come out and was available unabridged at Audible. I thought I’d spend $10 on it, or half the price I would have had to normally, and gain back some of the priveleges of membership - such as the ability to take advantage of sales, to gift audio books, etc.

In August, I burned out on my podcast habit, and felt like the only thing to bring back a bit of calm was to quit cold turkey and go back to my kindler and gentler days of mainly just listening to audio books. It’s odd, since I now have over 100 audio books that I haven’t read, most of them unabridged, that I wouldn’t feel the same compulsion to finish them as soon as possible. But I guess the difference is that these are not podcasts of news events that I feel compelled to be familiar with or else be “out of touch.” Many are novels, but there are plenty of non-fiction titles as well.

I think the seed for this move was generated when I bought my Treo 700P back in May. I was surprised to see that it had come with a $100 off coupon for some types of Audible memberships. I was resisting the temptation because at the time I was still totally committed, nay addicted, to podcasts, and so feared digging myself an even deeper hole! I wanted to have some chance of actually finishing what was on my plate! But by the time I had burned out on podcasts, I think I had given up on the thought I’d ever be able to keep up.

The $100 off an Audible.com makes each book “credit” cost about $5.42 (most books are 1 credit), at least if purchasing Audible’s Annual Platinum plan. This price is great when you compare it with what you would normally pay at a bookstore or online, save for maybe a used version of some book on eBay. Then when I was actually trying to sign up when I looked a little more closely at the offer. There’s some fine print at the bottom which says “Offer valid for new Audible customers only.” Doh! The only way around this is to actually create a new account with Audible and apply the coupon to that new account. Yes you can do this. Theoretically you can have as many accounts with Audible that you want. I don’t think Audible cares, as I know many who have multiple accounts. The one problem with this scenario is that if you want to have all your audio books on your iPod (or other compatible player), you can’t. Well, unless you have only one, or at most two accounts. You can’t activate more than two accounts on a given player. I suppose you could buy two or more iPods and then rack up accounts in order to take advantage of these discounts, but the added price of the player would kind of defeat the purpose. In any case, my problem was that my wife had an account as well, which had a number of books I hadn’t read and really wanted to. So I managed to dedicate most of my free time towards reading some of those books, and a few others I ended up skipping after I determined that I wasn’t enjoying them enough after the first hour or two to devote another 10+ hours.

So I signed up for the new account that gave me 24 credits. What do I do with those credits? So far, the only ones I’ve used were for a podcast! Well, that’s what Audible calls them anyway. They are basically the same type of subscriptions that Audible gives you the choice of downloading in the old more manual way or via a feed address. Unfortunately, as I’ve found, when you set it up in iTunes as a podcast via the feed they give you, it downloads a file that cannot be sped up as all other Audible content can be on the iPod. Yes, I still speed things up! Although I do this via the iPod’s built in ability that will only speed a file up by 20% or so, not the 50% I was doing in a much more belabored process with my podcasts earlier. I signed up for a subscription to The New Yorker magazine. Then I discovered a couple of free audible shows, one of which only comes out every month or two called Ear to the Ground, the other which comes out twice a week, called This is Audible. Both of these contain excerpts of audio books, interviews with authors, publishers, and others who talk about the books. Then just a week or two ago I discovered that my new account came with a complimentary subscription to the New York Times! So now I have around 27 hours of subscription/podcast content via my Audible account! I can’t escape the podcasts!

In an effort to try to organize things better, I went through my very long wish list on my old account to look for stuff that I could get rid of. I hadn’t done this in a while and I had lots of old stuff, and as it turned out a good amount of abridged stuff which Audible never did offer an unabridged version of. I made the rule that I wasn’t going to have anything abridged on the list, nor books that were more than 100 or so years old, since that would put them in the public domain and I could possibly get versions for free via Libravox or the Guttenberg Project. I used to add books to my wish list because they seemed interesting, and that’s fine, but after 2 or 3 or more years if they had no reviews and a rating of 3.5 or less, I didn’t have the confidence that these were books worth listening to. I was able to get my list down from a whopping 308 to a much more manageable 60 or so. Of course, I’ve also been adding new ones to this list due to hearing some of the books on This is Audible or Ear to the Gound which really interested me. But I’ve also paired things a bit by actually buying a few titles via special sales that Audible has had in the last month or so - they seem to be having sales pretty regularly now, maybe gearing up for even bigger ones towards the holidays in an effort to make some big sales numbers by the end of the year?
The point of this is that I’ve been listening to a lot of stuff, and have even managed to post a bunch of short reviews on an Audible Yahoo Group, but I thought I’d start posting them here as well, since I’m not posting much else these days! So watch for a bunch of these reviews as I have time to find them, spruce them up slightly and post them here.

Those of you following my blog for a while probably know that I write a lot about two gadgets in particular that I own – the Treo 650 phone (which I just upgraded to a Treo 700P) and the iPod (which I currently own the 5^th generation 60GB model capable of playing video). While I love both devices, my ultimate goal as a gadget freak is to only have one to carry around. You know, the whole “convergence” thing taken to it’s essence.

Some recent studies have suggested that most people want a phone that’s just a phone and doesn’t do a zillion other things. This may or may not be true, but if it is, I think it’s partly due to the current set of phones that “pretend” to be all-in-one devices. These phones are not the “smartphones” that comprise the Treo, Blackberry, and Windows Mobile phones, but rather are tiny stylish devices like the Motorola Razr which have cameras, calendars, and now often MP3 players built in.. The small screens and limited space for buttons and controls, not to mention a tiny batteries that have to cope with more demand for power, means that these devices end up being mainly good for novelty uses compared to dedicated MP3 players like the iPod or full-fledged digital cameras – even the sleekest compact of these.

For those of us who are too old or geeky to care about looking fashionable and don’t need the smallest phone on the block, the Palm (and previously Handspring) Treo have long been a great phone that combines a huge array of other uses due to its sporting the PalmOS operating system, the one used on Palm personal digital assistants for more than 10 years. Thousands of programs, many free and many others inexpensive shareware, have been written for this platform to the point where you could almost compare Treos to tiny PC’s.

For example I used my Treo 650 as a GPS (along with a tiny GPS receiver that hid in my glove compartment and which the Treo would connect to wirelessly) in order to get constant indications of where I was on the road, turn-by-turn directions to a destination, and even dynamic rerouting if I missed a turn – all communicated via both the Treo’s screen as well as a large choice of audio voices. I had all my contact information, schedules, to-do lists, and notes that I could sync with my MS Outlook and hosted exchange account. I had a version of Quicken (“Pocket Quicken” as it’s called), so I could record transactions on the road and sync with my main Quicken program when I got home. I had a program that allowed me to view my desktop of my PC at home and control any aspect of my computer no matter where I was. I got my email, of course, and was able to communicate via instant messages, text messaging, etc. I could also view full web pages and access most websites with no problem. Oh yes, and there was a phone too!

While the Treos had several MP3 players, none really gave the same degree of elegance as the combination of iTunes and the iPod. Many had features that the iPod didn’t, though. Pocket Tunes is the best known of these programs and has probably the largest array of capabilities - in addition to playing MP3’s, it can play Ogg Vorbis format files (an open-source format that has better quality and smaller files than MP3), and Windows Media Audio file format (a proprietary format that MS developed). Within the last year it also started supporting DMA-protected WMA files from music subscription sites like Yahoo! Music, Rhapsody, and Napster To Go. This allows you to subscribe to a service for a $10-15/month fee and download an unlimited number of songs to your computer and subsequently to your portable device. Pocket Tunes in its Deluxe version also has had the ability to stream a type of internet radio called Shoutcast (MP3 streams), so you could listen to live radio, although until very recently not at a very good quality level due to the network speeds at which cell phones have been able to communicate. If you are an audio book fan and have an account with the largest digital audio book company out there, Audible.com, Treos, as well as all PalmOS and PocketPC-based phones and PDA’s have long been able to sync Audible format files from your computer and play them. More recently those who have a phone with a cellular data plan or a PDA with a Wifi connection could also download programs from their Audible library on the fly via a program called Audible Air.

Most of the MP3 players for the Treo have traditionally done their syncing, at least on Windows PC’s, through Microsoft’s Windows Media Player which is free and built in to the Windows Operating System. Alternately you can simply copy files directly onto an external memory card on your Treo and then let the program search for these files and add them to its library. While this works, it’s far from ideal now that cards with very large capacities are being sold inexpensively and for those of us who have tens of gigabytes of audio files, be they music, audio books, or podcasts. Some people fare well with Windows Media player, but in my brief time trying to use it to sync with my Treo, I had numerous problems, ranging from it recopying files that were already on my device each time I synced, to not copying files that should have been copied, etc. It simply wasn’t reliable.

While there were certainly limitations before that made the earlier Treos not the ideal choice of everyone as an MP3 player, many people have and do use the Treo 650, 600, perhaps even earlier ones still as their only portable music player. The Treo 700P, Palm’s latest version of the Treo, has features that make it a much more powerful device, all the more capable of replacing your primary MP3 player. The main feature that helps make the phone more powerful is its ability transfer data at much higher speeds than previously via a newer wireless (cellular, not Wifi) network technology, called EvDO. While the version of EvDO that’s currently available and accessible via the 700P is still not quite as fast as what most people have in their homes via their DSL or Cable Internet connection, it still ranges from three to ten times the speed of a dial-up modem. This speed will improve, especially when future versions of EvDO get deployed. The difference in speed means that your Treo can now stream live video and high-quality audio. You can download applications in seconds rather than minutes. Surfing the web is now a lot more like it is on a broadband connection on a PC, albeit with a much smaller screen. Just as broadband on the PC gives you more freedom to explore the Internet on demand, EvDO on a phone gives you more motivation to use it for accessing the Internet. It used to be that for many uses I would just delay what I needed to do until I got home because doing it on the slow data connection on my phone was too painful. It was only when I knew I wouldn’t be near a PC for a long time and I really needed to get some information on the web that I would use the Treo for accessing a website.

Another key new feature is the Treo 700P’s ability to handle memory cards that can hold more than 2GB, the limit of previous Treos. Although installing a hack could let you work around that limit on those older models, it required some degree of technical expertise to do. Now you can just plug in your 4GB SD card and it will work as a 4GB card without any extra work. Presumably when 8GB SD cards and even 16GB and 32GB SD cards come out in the next year or two, these will all work as well without additional software or hacking. While 4GB is still low compared to the storage on some MP3 players, it’s large enough to hold dozens of albums worth of music, not too shabby for a card the size of a postage stamp.

With these (and many other) new capabilities and a couple of new applications from third-party developers, it looks like the Treo 700P could easily replace an iPod for many people, myself included. The third party applications that I speak of are Motion Apps’ mOcean, CodeWave’s myTunesRSS, and Softick’s “Softick Audio Gateway.” There are additional applications that enhance the Treo’s multimedia capabilities worlds above the current iPods, but I’ll tackle those later.

Motion Apps’ mOcean is an MP3 player for the Treo that syncs with your iTunes library and actually has an interface that looks and acts a lot like an iPod. Obviously the Treo doesn’t have the famed iPod “clickwheel,” so instead mOcean provides a graphical version of the clickwheel that you can use via the Treo’s touchscreen. In fact, Apple is rumored to be coming out with similar touchscreen clickwheel interface for a future Video iPod that will do away with the physical clickwheel in order to recoup space for an expanded screen. It almost feels like I have a future iPod in my hands when I’m using mOcean! mOcean actually improves on the iPod in some ways due to the Treo having a keyboard – for example you can skip to the S’s in a large list of songs my just hitting the ’s’ key, rather than have to scroll with the clickwheel until you got all the way to the s’s. Although though there are some minor inconsistencies that probably in many cases only advanced iPod/iTunes users would notice, for the most part it is an extremely close replica of the iPod/iTunes experience, and Motion Apps appear to be constantly working on new features and functionality. The only obvious shortfall is the lack of ability to play AAC files and video files, but other programs are available on the Treo that that will do this, like the free TCPMP.

MyTunesRSS is a streaming server that you run on a PC that’s connected to the Internet. It syncs up with your iTunes library and makes your PC a streaming server for any audio and even video content that is in your iTunes (although for video you have a really good, fast connection for it to work well). For those of us with tens of gigabytes of audio and video files in our libraries, this allows you to have immediate access to your entire library without having to go out and buy ten or twenty 4GB memory cards, or have to wait until they come out with larger capacity cards. Of course, your ability to play these files is dependent on being in an area where you can get a data connection, and probably even an EvDO connection, which is still mostly in major metropolitan areas. So, for those who spend any time traveling or in more rural areas, this may not be a great solution.

The other piece of this content puzzle is something that isn’t quite as obvious, but for me was an important factor in realizing that using my Treo for listing to podcasts, audio books and music might be a better solution that using my iPod. If you have an MP3 player like an iPod and you’re listening to music and your cell phone rings, you have to shut off the iPod, take your earbuds out, and answer your phone, all before the caller on the other end hangs up. It can be a bit of a hassle, and if you have to use a handsfree device for your phone it makes it that much harder still. The 700P comes with a handsfree headset that doubles as stereo headphones. This allows you to listen to audio on your Treo, and then when a call comes in, it interrupts your music or podcast or audio book and prompts you to answer the phone, at which point the stereo headphones simply become a handsfree headset through which you can have a conversation. While this makes things a lot easier than having a phone and an MP3 player as separate devices, it still means you need to take the Treo out of your pocket or off your belt in order to answer the call.

Earlier this year, a company that has been making other well-known and useful software for the Treo and other Palm devices for years came out with a way to do this all wirelessly. Some quick background first. The wireless technology which I’m referring to here, and which you’ve undoubtedly heard of by now, is called “Bluetooth.” It was designed specifically for devices to communicate with other devices at short range (30 feet or less) and at relatively slow speeds (much slower than wireless networking known as Wifi). Probably the most popular use for this technology so far is the wireless headsets for cell phones that you might see planted in or over people’s ear. If that ear is on the side of their head that’s not visible to you, it’s easy to initially think they are talking to themselves when they are actually having a phone conversation. While Bluetooth has been very useful for this use, it does not, as you might expect, allow you to listen to audio other than that of a phone call. To listen to stereo music, you need to have a phone and a device that implements something called an Advanced Audio Distribution Profile, or A2DP, which allows wireless digital streaming of different types of digital audio formats fromone device to another. Unfortunately even the latest greatest Treo does not support A2DP. Fortunately for us, the genius programmers at Softick worked around this lack of capability of the Treo so that it could actually do A2DP with compatible Bluetooth stereo headsets that have started to become available in the last year or two. So now you don’t even have to bother with taking the Treo out of your pocket or off of your belt to answer a call while your listening to something. You can do everything wirelessly, including pausing the audio and skipping to the next or previous track. I can see one really nice use of this for me – I can now do yard work with a headset on and keep my Treo on the deck, safe from getting wet or full dirt!

A couple of caveats about this should be mentioned, though. While Softick’s program works on previous Treos, it still doesn’t quite work on the 700P. Palm updated the Bluetooth implementation on the 700P, breaking the compatibility, and so now Softick is hard at work trying to come up with a version that will work on the 700P – something that they are hoping to get out in the next week or so. Also, to be fair, you can buy Bluetooth headsets with an attachment that plugs into an iPod. This does add a considerable amount of bulk, though, to the otherwise fairly small iPod, making it a good deal larger than the Treo, although you could also use these on the much smaller iPod Nano.

When Apple came out with the Video iPod, it was the biggest leap in functionality since the first iPod debuted in 2001. The success of the video capability has convinced many movie and television companies to offer video for sale on the iTunes Music Store, or even for free over the Internet. And while mOcean still doesn’t sync video content yet, you can watch both streaming video as well as video files you’ve transferred from your computer to your Treo via a cabled hotsync. Not only that, but you can watch video in many more formats than you can with the iPod. The iPod allows only for a couple of types of Mpeg 4 formats, whereas programs like TCMP and Kinoma allow for AVI, DivX, XviD, and various Mpeg formats.

Finally, through yet additional third-party software and services, you can listen to or view a slew of additional content on your Treo that will not be possible on an iPod unless Apple actually develops an iPod phone that does EvDO, or an iPod with Wifi built in. Orb is a product that lets you use you stream all your audio, video, and even pictures to any computer capable of receiving them, and it has been tested successfully with the Treo 700P. Not only that, but if you have a TV Tuner card in your PC you can actually stream all the live channels you get through that tuner card as well. A similar service/product called Slingbox also will also let you do this, although they are still working on the software that will let you do this with a Treo. For those who subscribe to Satellite Radio, there is a way to use your Treo to stream your XM or Serius channels directly to your Treo. There are other streaming servers like Gloonet, and I’m sure ones that I’ve not even heard of yet, but the ones I’ve listed are probably the best known.

The iPod has become so popular for good reasons. It’s not just that it’s had a great marketing force behind it (although it has), or just great looks (that too), or that it was one of the first players to incorporate a hard drive that could store hundreds (or thousands) of songs. It’s also that the user interface on the iPod is for most people a very easy and intuitive one to operate. Its syncing abilities are also easy to set up and understand, at least compared to most other platforms out there. iTunes, the PC part of the iPod, is also pretty streightward and manages music (and now video) in a simple and powerful way.

I realize that some people truly don’t want anything but a small device to play their 30 favorite albums on, and for them, I suppose, an iPod (as well as many other MP3 players) is still a great choice. Heck, for them, anything more than an iPod Nano would be overkill. However, for those of us who are always looking for more powerful gadgets, ones that can serve most if not all of our requirements for a portable device (be they to listen to audio, watch video, make phone calls, read email, etc., etc.) the Treo 700P really is a powerhouse of convergence. With the services and software I’ve mentioned in this article, it can do everything and much more than current iPod models, and with mOcean can even look and act like an iPod. It does this at a price that’s at least equivalent to the top 60GB iPod model (if you buy the Treo 700P along with a 2-year cell phone contract), or at most for a couple hundred more, if paying buying at the top retail price with no discounts. The main disadvantage to the Treo, other than what some people would consider to be it’s inferior look fashion-wise, is the fact that it doesn’t have a big built-in hard drive. While 4GB is a lot for some people, and certainly is still the most you can have on an iPod Nano as of now, it still pales in comparison to the mammoth 60GB hard drive in the top-of-the-line iPod model. With myTunesRSS and other streaming solutions, you can get around this, but you are still dependent on having an EvDO signal, which is still far from ubiquitous. EvDO coverage will increase, of course, as will memory card capacities, making this less of an issue, but for now, some will still consider it too much of a limitation to give up their iPod altogether. Plus, as coverage and storage capacity increases on the Treo, it’s unlikely that the iPod will stand still. The rumor is that a new video iPod with a much larger screen will come out later this year and will make watching video on the Treo look weak in comparison. Along with that bigger screen may come additional features that will remove more advantages of the Treo, such as Bluetooth or Wifi capability.

For right now, though, the Treo does still seem to win in all but storage capacity. Heck, even its battery is replaceable, unlike the infamous non-replaceable iPod’s! I for one am going to ditch my iPod. That doesn’t mean I won’t be tempted by future ones. If a new one comes out that has a screen twice the size of my Treo’s, it’s going to be hard to resist. Then again, since I don’t watch nearly as much video as I do listen to audio podcasts, audio books, and music, it would be hard to justify having both of these. Hopefully, though, Palm’s next Treo will also sport a larger screen, or at least a video output as the iPod does which allows for plugging in video goggles that make screen size irrelevant!

My killer feature for the iPod is something that probably doesn’t appeal to you. Ok, maybe some of you, but not many. It’s the feature that Apple introduced with the 4G iPods back a couple of years ago. The feature is the ability to speed up (or slow down) audio without changing the pitch (if you are familiar with variable speed tape recorders, you understand that simply speeding up the playback of something tends to also make the speaker sound like a chipmunk).

Why is this a killer feature? It lets you play one minute and fifteen seconds of audio for every minute you listen. In other words, you get an extra 25% of content. I listen to a lot of spoken audio – audio books and podcasts – and this means that I get to enjoy a lot of extra content in the same stretch time. It’s a time saver. You get to save countless hours by listening at faster speeds, just as a speed reader gets to read many more books in the time a normal reader would.

There are some downsides, but I don’t think they are significant for most audio. One is that you have to pay closer attention, since drifting off a bit will mean that you will miss a lot more than you would normally, plus it just takes more concentration to comprehend everything at a higher speed. There are some audio artifacts that sometimes occur as well. Those artifacts aren’t jarring, but do degrade the sound quality slightly. Oh yes, and of course you just have a different listening experience. For some audio, timing and cadence can be a big part of the narrator’s performance. Speeding this up can wreak havoc on it - especially for dramatic naration of audio fiction. On the other hand, I’ve gotten so used to listening to nonfiction at this speed that now when I listen to podcasts at the normal speed, the speaker sounds like he’s talking in slow motion! So to some degree it’s just a matter of getting accustomed to it.

While the iPod is the only (or one of the few) digital audio players that has this functionality built in, it doesn’t let you just listen to anything in this fashion. Nope, you can listen to Audible.com audio books (or Audible’s other paid content like radio programs, newspaper transcripts, etc.), and you can listen to files in AAC spoken word format (.M4B). Since most podcasts are in MP3 format, you have to convert them. This is one reason why I use Doppler Radio as my podcast program, or “podcatcher” – it is the only podcatcher that I’ve found wihich converts files to .M4B. Some others convert to .M4A, but you still need to rename them and that implies updating iTunes with the new filename – a manual and cumbersome process.

While Doppler’s conversion works well, it has its disadvantages too, the main one being that iTunes (which is the program actually doing the conversions) can take a while to convert files. The fastest I’ve seen it work is 20X (or 20 times real time). So an hour-long show will take about 3 minutes at that speed. But most of the time, it seems to range from 5 to 12X, or 5 to 12 minutes per hour-long show. iTunes can only convert one show at a time, and so if you have a couple of hours worth of shows downloading at a given session, this could take upwards of 25 minutes to convert! It’s far from ideal.

Now, while I do have this killer feature with the iPod, I would rather that such a feature existed on other devices so that I wasn’t forced to only use an iPod. Don’t get me wrong, I like my iPod, but there are certainly things I don’t like about it as well. The main thing that irks me about it is that you can’t use music subscription services like Yahoo! Music because it won’t play Windows Media files. Apple’s system is built to be proprietary – you can only use the iTunes Music Store to download music (other than free MP3’s from independent artists or your own ripped from CD), and the iTunes Music Store only supports Apple devices. For those who need the speeding up feature, unfortunately, the iPod still seems to be your only choice.

While I could not find other players with this functionality, I thought I’d see what I could find out about speeding up audio in general. My main find proved quite interesting. It’s a Windows software program that does this very thing called, inappropriately enough, Amazing Slow Downer (or ASD), by Roni Music. I guess the name is somewhat appropriate because it can slow audio down, but it can also speed it up. I’m not sure about the utility of slowing things down, but my guess would be so that musicians can listen to a song at a much slower rate in order to pick up notes and chords more easily?

ASD allows you to take any MP3 file (or other formats as well), speed them up or slow them down arbitrarily with a fine degree of control, and then rip them to MP3 (or another format for other encodings). You can control the pitch yourself, although it seemed to automatically handle that. You can also control the audio qualities via an equalizer in order to yield the best quality sound. I played around with the trial version I downloaded from Roni Music’s site and was able to speed up a sample podcast by 42% and still follow everything. I figure you could probably train yourself to understand higher and higher levels of speed.

This was a great find and maybe there are other such applications out there but I haven’t found any yet. As nice as it is, though, I can see using it for major jobs, but not on such a regular basis as Doppler. Much of the spoken word audio I listen to is downloaded via Doppler on almost an hourly basis. So when I listen to something, it’s often only hours or at most a few days old - an ongoing stream of current podcasts. Unfortunately there’s no way to have Doppler “talk” to this program and have it automatically convert these podcasts into faster ones. Neither is there a command-line interface as far as I can tell, so even if Doppler could issue external commands (which I’ve seen in some other podcatchers), this wouldn’t work. What you would have to do is dump all my podcasts into one directory (Doppler puts them into separate directories named after the podcast’s title) and before uploading them to the iPod you would have to run this program and tell it to convert all new files – also determining which of those files were new so that you weren’t reconverting already converted ones (you could change the names or put them in different directories but this would then mean having to go into iTunes and tell it where those new files were, or what they’d been renamed to – otherwise iTunes would remove them from the iPod). Neither will ASD do anything with Audible files, which is to be expected since they have a proprietary DRM. Then there’s the issue of speed. The trial version of ASD only lets you work with 3 minutes worth of audio. I was able to rip this to a 2-minute-long MP3 in a matter of seconds, but it’s hard to extrapolate this to a 30-minute podcast, let alone a bunch of podcasts of various lengths adding up to a couple of hours worth of listening.

Where ASD might come in handy is if you find a bunch of MP3 spoken word files that you want to listen to - say open source stuff from Librivox or Project Gutenberg. Or possibly if you find a podcast that you’ve never heard but has been recording for many months and you want to catch up and listen to all the old episodes. Or you buy a new audio book on CD and want to rip it to MP3 to play it on your portable device. I can see using this for such things because they are one-shot deals rather than a constant, ongoing process.

We can dream that Erwin Van Hunen, the creator of Doppler, will put this type of functionality into Doppler 3.0, but considering how busy he is with other things, it’s hard to imagine that he could devote such resources to what is essentially donationware.

Despite the probably small number of people who find this functionality irresistible, perhaps there are enough of us to encourage a developer out there to create a podcatcher that has similar functionality, or maybe the developer of ASD will actually consider developing a podcatcher with it? Or perhaps we can get Roni Music to partner with Erwin and come up with a premium podcatcher that has this functionality. Well, we can dream!

Several weeks ago, Apple announced their newest version of the iPod, the much anticipated one that allows owners to watch videos.

I generally have very good rationalizations when it comes to upgrading my gadgets and this time was no different. After all, I had resisted getting the photo iPod when it came out earlier this year. No, I figured, there needs to be a very significant value added over and above what I have in order to upgrade. Having a better screen, even allowing you to view pictures (something I could do on my Phone for years now) was not enough.

While I said I’m not the biggest video buff, especially these days with a new baby in the house, the various new features and enhancements that were better than my old 4th Generation monochrome iPod (all of a year old now) just added up to a critical mass and convinced me that it was time to upgrade:

For one, there’s the video, of course. While I’m probably still probably going to be using the iPod 99% or more for audio, it would be nice to load many of my unwatched DVD’s that I’ve been wanting to watch for years, not to mention TV shows that I miss on a regular basis these days, or whole series that I missed out on. As you may have heard, Apple and Disney teamed up to offer some of Disney’s content, which includes some ABC shows like “Lost” and “Desperate Housewives”. I’d always heard raves about Lost, but never got around to watching it last year and I’m one of those people who refuse to pick up watching a show when I haven’t come in at the beginning – at least dramatic shows. While buying the shows individually can add up at $2 a pop, one thing that I haven’t heard mention in the other articles I’ve read about these downloadable shows is that you can actually buy a season’s worth of a show for nice discounted - about $1.40 per show instead of the normal $1.99. Unfortunately, you can’t do this with a season that isn’t complete - I can’t pay for all of season 2 of Lost because it hasn’t all been made available yet and Apple just doesn’t seem to have the mechanisms in their iTunes Store to handle this kind of “subscription” of ongoing content. Maybe their venture into podcasting will help them implement something like this in the future, though.

Then there’s home video. We got a digital camcorder last Spring in anticipation of our first child and I’ve been slowly trying to figure out video editing and production. I figured it would be a nice thing to keep a collection of clips of events or just clips of our daughter playing and smiling.

The new iPod will also let you record audio at 44kbps, rather than a measly 8kbps for previous models. Not that I have any big plans to start my own podcast, but this does at least open up the possibility of recording audio on the go, whether that’s just notes to myself, a conversation, a class, or our daughter “talking” to us.

The large capacity of the 60GB iPod would seem like more than enough for all your possible needs, but Video can take up a LOT of space. We are talking hundreds of megabytes per hour - and that’s highly compressed! Even at 60GB, Apple states its capacity at all of 150 hours of Video. This might seem a lot, but I have about 1,400 hours of Audio Books currently on my iPod, and these take up less than 20GB. This audio book collection keeps growing as I continue to download books from a subscription to Audible.com and little time to actually listen to them and move them off the iPod. Another 12GB or so are taken up by a music collection which I’m sure will grow as our daughter gets older and we put more music for her on it. Finally, there are couple of gigabytes of podcasts that I can’t seem to get caught up on either! So already I was getting dangerously close to my old iPod’s limit of 40GB! That extra space will really be useful, although of course I would love to have 100GB (or 200GB for that matter) instead of 60GB!

My old iPod supposedly had 12 hours of battery life, and while that might have been true initially, it always seemed the battery meter was getting low way before that time. It could be the battery meter was just faulty, who knows. In any case, the new 60GB model that I bought is rated at 19+ hours of playtime for music, so I think I could safely listen for many days without having to recharge. Of course, Video can kill the battery in around 3 hours, so if I end up using it a lot for that, I may have to look into a battery pack that expands battery life to 9 hours for video.

Finally, the new iPods are considerably thinner than the old ones. For someone who has lots of gadgets and sometimes carries them in pockets, this definitely helps me not look like a total buffoon, in addition to just being more comfortable to carry.

Oh yes, also, I figured, I could sell the old iPod on eBay and not pay full price for the new one.
Equipped with an airtight rationale for upgrading, I went to the Apple store the week after the new iPod was announced and was told that it wouldn’t be in until the end of the month (October). However, on the iLounge.com forums, people were sighting them at other Apple stores across the country, so I kept coming back and pestering the poor Apple store staff. Within a couple days they had the 30GB model, but it was not on display. Instead the item was tucked in the pocket of one of the staff that let me look at it. He said there would be no 60GB model until the following week, but I knew that these estimates seemed always to be very conservative. So I continued to return every day and ask if they had a 60GB model and within just a couple of days, they did and I grabbed it!

Impressions

My general impressions of this “5th Generation” iPod model are generally favorable. I’ll talk about the video aspects of it below, but other than that, it seems to work as well, for the most part, as my old iPod. The big color screen is of course a whole lot prettier than my old monochrome model, but it also seems a bit more “sluggish” in its display. That is, when navigating between tracks or even between the different “pages” of an individual track (the scrubbing page, the album art page, the rating page, etc.), the screen doesn’t transition immediately, but lags a second or two before changing. When navigating to the next track, the audio for that track kicks in immediately, but the screen stays on the old track’s info for a second or two before changing. This isn’t a huge deal, but it makes it feel a lot less responsive than I would like. A couple of other minor issues that may or may not annoy some people follow:

1. The lack of a true power supply. All previous iPods had a separate power supply to charge the unit, but for these, you have to charge them via the computer via the supplied USB cable. Not particularly convenient if you want to take the iPod with you on a trip and don’t want to or can’t bring your computer! You can still buy a power supply separately, but for the price, Apple really shouldn’t be REMOVING accessories that were previously included.

2. The lack of a firewire interface. IPods can no longer connect to a computer via firewire. Some people believe firewire is faster than USB2 despite that according to the specifications USB2 is slightly faster. I’ve also heard that for video transfer from digital camcorder, firewire is critical. But I’m not sure how much of that is pure transfer speed and how much are other factors like consistently steady throughput. In any case, there’s probably not a tremendous difference between the two and so you wouldn’t notice a big different unless you are transferring a significant amount of content.

3. The removal of the port on the top of the iPod which many accessories use. This essentially has made these iPods incompatible with dozens, if not hundred of accessories that used this port. I had two of these myself, which I was fortunately able to sell along with my iPod. Many others, I’m sure, would have much rather keep their accessories, especially if they were expensive to begin with and/or can’t be resold for much.

Video: is it the Video iPod or iPod with Video?

When these new iPods first came out, Apple touted them not as the “Video iPod” but as an iPod “with Video capabilities.” It was as if they still weren’t ready to come out and say that video was in any way a central feature. They had to qualify this release by saying that the iPod was still primarily a music player. Whether this was BECAUSE they didn’t think the video capabilities were good enough, or whether they actually didn’t put everything they could into making video as good as it could be, I’m not sure. What I do know is that video on the iPod works reasonably well considering the small screen size, and some other issues that I’ll get to below.

As far as screen size is concerned, Apple enlarged the screen as much as they could within the confines of the standard iPod dimensions. They even sacrificed a bit of size of the click wheel in order to do this. Sure, they could have radically altered the design by stretching the screen across the entire front and changed the click-wheel to some other interface, or even implemented a touch screen that included the clickwheel as an image on that screen instead of an actual hardware click-wheel. Obviously, though, Apple did not want to take such a big risk in radically altering the interface that has helped them win and maintain such a commanding majority of the MP3 player market. As it stands, the screen is certainly watchable, but I don’t know if I would want to spend multiple hours staring at it! Even holding it up close, watching an episode of Lost, I felt a little like I was taking the images in through a straw. A big straw - maybe something akin to the cardboard tube that paper towel is wrapped around – but still it was constraining, if you understand what I mean.

The other way that Apple made a very hesitant step in the direction of Video was in its choice to only allow a couple of video formats to be compatible with the new iPod. Neither of these formats is proprietary per se, but they are not particularly popular outside of Apple’s own software. I’m sure part of this was also to prevent those who have big libraries of video in more popular formats (read “DVIX”), that they’ve either converted themselves or gotten illicitly off Grokster or BitTorrent, from easily playing them on the new devices, thus getting Apple slammed by big media companies as being too friendly towards file sharers. The result is that you can still do this, but it just takes more work: if you have a bunch of DVIX-encoded video files, you just have to convert them yet again to H.264 or MPEG4.

As for what kind of content there is available, you can download a select list of ABC TV shows - five to be exact from Apple’s iTunes Music Store. You can also download around 3,000 music videos. Whether it’s a 3-minute music video or a 30-minute TV show, the price is still $1.99. Apple also announced that, after the first 20 days from the launch of the new iPod and the video content in the iTunes music store, over 1 Million of those videos had been purchased. They did not reveal how many were the TV episodes and how many were music videos. Not bad considering this product was brand new and wasn’t even easy to find in stores for the first couple of weeks after the launch. Then again, I wonder how much of these purchasers were people like me who don’t plan to make a habit of doing it, but still wanted to see a sample of what they could have on their new iPods without going through all the effort of converting.

Unfortunately, it seems that the other networks are not jumping onto the Apple bandwagon, but at least for now scrambling to sign deals to make their content available in other “downloadable” forms. NBC has signed a deal with DirectTV and CBS has signed a deal with Comcast so that respective users of these services can download shows onto their DVR. But you can’t then transfer these shows to a portable player, which is the main feature of the iPod. So, this then forces people who want to have portable content into either recording these shows themselves and converting them, or even worse obtaining illegal copies on the Internet - all because the networks still want to limit how people watch, despite this supposed venture into new forms of content distribution. Just today AOL and Warner Bros. announced a new online venture to bring older tv shows to the internet, but again, there seems to be no plan to offer an option for content portability. Another announcement today from Hasbro does involve portable content, but only through Hasbro’s VUGO device. Even at best it looks like the interests involved will still end up carving out small domains where only certain content is available via a given service/device. A fragmented mess that’s bound to encourage pirates to record or obtain the content illegally and crack the protective DRM that prevents it from playing on all but one device.

Of course, as with music, one might already have a lot of video in the form of DVD movies. These movies can be transferred to the iPod, but it isn’t a trivial process. It takes time, some degree of technical knowledge, and experimenting with tools that are still clunky, in beta, or which will cost you additional money. And don’t expect Apple to help you very much in this effort. Apple’s tool for converting video to a format the iPod plays, Quicktime Pro (Mac users can also use iMovie), will not convert a DVD for you in and of itself - you still need a DVD decoder. Even then, Quicktime Pro is a $30 program and is one of the notoriously slowest video converters out there, although it does seem to work predictably without much hassle. Other applications are a lot speedier, but some have had difficulty in getting them to work at all. Some video formats simply won’t convert in some of these applications, whereas other problems could be in the various settings that one can use for a given conversion (bit rates, keyframes, resolution, etc., etc.) that aren’t exactly within the iPod’s constraints.

I experienced this myself in a free converter for Windows called Videora iPod Converter when I tried to convert some home video clips that were in uncompressed AVI format - what I thought was one of the most basic video formats. These AVI files were created with Adobe Premier Elements and whenever I tried to convert them, they would either not transfer to the iPod or they would only produce an audio track, not a video track. After trying just about every setting I could think of, I finally converted the AVI file to another format, and then converting it with Videora. This worked immediately. Other programs that offer conversion and dvd decryption in one package and have gotten some good reviews are Nero Recode and PQDVD on the PC side, and Handbreak on Mac (and Linux).

In addition to the video that one can download from Apple and the video that one can convert from DVD, there’s yet another category of freely available content available on the internet - video podcasts, video blogs, and other such episodic content. A new site that was just created to link to various kinds of content like this that is available in formats that will work right off the bat with the new iPod is FreeIpodVideos.org. A couple of other great sources for free video that you will undoubtedly have to convert to play on the new iPods are the Internet Archive’s Moving Images and Google Video.

The one other video issue that I hadn’t thought much about before I got the iPod (mainly because I’ve never had a video-capable device like this) is the issue of outputting the video to a TV. Now, one might ask why you would want to do this if the whole point of having a portable player is to watch things away from home. True, but at the same time, if you could watch something on a much bigger screen, wouldn’t you opt for that, especially if you want to share the video with multiple people? Just as people bring their iPods to friends and hook them to a stereo so that everyone can enjoy your music collection, so too can you share videos or pictures. You still have to buy an extra connector to do this either via Apple for $20, or from a Radio Shack or place like it for a bit less.

Once you export the video to TV, you will see that video that has been optimized specifically for the iPod within its native 320×240 resolution, and it will not look very good except on sets that are at most 25″. Since most people tend to have larger TV sets these days, this becomes a problem. One way to avoid it is by changing the resolution to something higher than what the iPod itself displays. The iPod will then just scale it down when displaying it on its small screen, but will display all the resolution when connecting to a TV – given the TV can display the given resolution. Unfortunately there are still limits. Apple lists a max resolution for MPEG4 files as 480×480. This is somewhat of an odd resolution, being completely square, as opposed to the more rectangular standard TV screen or the even more elongated widescreen dimensions. But that 480×480 is a bit misleading. What it really means is that 480 pixels times 480 pixels yields a total of 230,400 pixels. So one can create videos of ANY resolution as long as their total pixel count doesn’t exceed this. For example 640×360 also comes to 230,400 pixels, but is much more rectangular. In any case, when you pump up the resolution from 240 vertical lines to 360 or even higher, the picture becomes much more watchable on a large TV.

The one issue that remains may not be an issue for everyone, but it is for anyone who has a widescreen TV. It appears that the iPod doesn’t support a way to export anamorphic widescreen video to a widescreen TV. By this I mean that anything that is played on a widescreen TV via the iPod, whether that source video is in a widescreen format or not, does not fill the entire widescreen TV. Rather, they show up in the middle, so there are boxes on the sides as well as the top and bottom. I have asked on the forums about this and no one has given a satisfactory definitive issue. I even tried to get in touch with Apple, but I guess a lowly blogger is not worthy of a response. If they somehow surprise me after a week and actually answer my question, I will post an update here. Here’s an image of a widescreen movie playing on the iPod itself:

And here’s an image of that same movie piped out to my widescreen TV:

Again, this probably is not going to be a huge issue with a lot of people right now, but I was really hoping that this would work since most of my DVD’s and all my recent home video is filmed in widescreen. So having to watch it in this small area within my TV set seems a bit pointless. Then again, I could always export the home videos to DVD and get full resolution displays, it just would be nice to be able to view them in the same (or almost the same) way via the iPod on my own and other people’s widescreen TV’s…

Pocket Tunes is one of if not THE premier audio application for the PalmOS, and I’ve been using it since I bought my Treo 600 over a year ago. Normsoft, the company that makes it, comes out regularly with new releases with new features, all of which have so far been free of charge for me. Most of the updates I’ve seen have been more tweaking of features to make them work better. However, this morning, they have released a huge new feature that will enhance the utility of the Treo (and many other PalmOS devices) for many of us music fans.

According to their site:

I’ve written before about my experiences with Yahoo! Music. Just a couple of months ago, Yahoo! released a new subscription based service similar to Napster To Go and Rhapsody which allows users to listen to any of the 1 million albums in their library on demand on a PC and optionally download tracks onto a compatible portable device all for under $60 for an entire year – a price that seriously undercut the competition.”

While I signed up right away and have enjoyed listening to a lot of music on my home and work computer, I did not have a compatible device. I have an iPod, but because Apple has it’s own iTunes Music Store, it’s unlikely that they would ever make their iPod compatible with a competing download service. It’s much more likely that Apple will simply start up their own similar subscription-based service that will only be iPod-compatible. It’s unfortunate that an open standard can’t be developed so that all devices will work with all services. Already licensing issues mean that certain countries get access to certain albums while others don’t, and of course certain services get access to labels that others don’t. Why do you need to have two seperate devices and subscribe to three different services so that you can listen to three albums that are on different labels? Each label might as well start selling their own proprietary format, each of which you need a different player to listen to. It’s ridiculous.

In any case, I have been looking at each new audio player that’s been announced recently to see whether it would be compatible with Yahoo! Music. But for me the other requirement is that it will play audio books from Audible.com. Unfortunately up until now, the only other device that seemed to play both Audible files as well as Yahoo! Music files was the AudioVox SMT5600 SmartPhone. Since I already have a Treo, this wasn’t a good choice. But my Treo will now allow me to listen to both of these types audio formats, as well as other MP3, WMA, and Ogg Vorbis files, and internet radio (streaming MP3) through PocketTunes, and Apple’s preferred AAC (but not it’s iTunes Music Store DRM Files) files via a different program (Aeroplayer), and RealAudio files with the Real’s player that’s included with the Treo 650. In other words, the Treo 650 (and other PalmOS devices) is, in large part due to companies like Normsoft, becoming more and more a convergence device for Audio (along with the many other areas of convergence).

Now that Audio is becoming is becoming such a major feature of this phone, it’s really key to start beefing up the storage. I have a 1GB card, of which 300MB is already filled up with maps, images, etc. I know one can find 2GB cards, but compared to my 40GB iPod, even 2GB seems paltry, not to mention these cards come at a big premium. I am hoping that at least the next version of the Treo includes an internal 4GB hard drive like the LifeDrive, or better yet, one of the larger 6GB ones that are making it into many of the mini audio players these days.

I’ve talked about the difficulty of staying on top of all the content I want to consume these days. This is one of the biggest double-edged swords to the net. You have so many choices that it’s hard to keep up with even a fraction of them. One might ask why you need to “keep up” at all, but perhaps that’s only my obsessive-compulsive streak playing out. In fact, that is part of the reason I haven’t posted for a while. This week I’ve been trying hard not to keep up, but just to get through some of the backlog that seems to build up in record time. I could seriously spend every waking second reading, listening, and watching all this stuff, but, although this is obvious, one really needs to create filters to pick and choose because there’s way to much produced in a single day for one individual to consume probably in an entire lifetime.

(A quick side note. I am going to try for the first time to divide this particular entry into a few different “parts” which will actually be separate entries. A fellow blogger has suggested this mainly because my entries tend to me so long and this will allow people to consume them in smaller and easier “gulps.” Let me know how this works for you. If it doesn’t, I won’t do it again.)
Content types:

“Content” is one of those way overused words, but I don’t know of anything else to describe the general conglomeration of all the different types of information you can consume. I can clearly categorize this content into three main forms: audio, video, and text:

Text: text for me is mainly about blogs and rss feeds. I use Bloglines to “keep up” because it lets you hold onto an historical record of what you’ve read or haven’t read. This way, I can come back after a week of not reading Boing Boing and have 200 old entries stacked up instead of just getting the last 30. Keeping up is still a struggle, but it’s mostly just a matter of time. As far as the portability issue, I can access my Bloglines account from any computer connected to the net, and even on my Treo 650, although its mobile interface has some inherent flaws that cripple its usefulness for me. There are other readers specifically built for handheld devices, but none yet with the same functionality I describe above - Bloglines seems to have an exclusive on both for portable and non-portable solutions. What about books, you ask? I’ve never gotten into eBooks, but of course there are plenty of old-fashioned paper books on my bookshelf. Alas I am a slow reader in general which means that I opt for audio books whenever possible because it makes reading faster.

Video: video for me is mainly about a collection of DVD’s much of which I haven’t even watched for the first time, and TiVo. The DVD’s are kind of like books. They tend to be movies that are at least a couple of hours long, and what with the bonus features, commentaries, etc., it could be many more hours to fully consume a DVD’s content. TiVo lets me record the programming I want to see and watch it as I have time or inclination. TiVo by itself can be quite different from consuming a backlog of blog entries mainly because TiVo’s have a limited amount of space to record. So at a certain point your TiVo will have to delete content in order to record new content. Of course I did an end-run around this limitation by buying the Humax DRT-800 which includes a DVD writer, so if I ever get too low on space, I can always just burn as many DVD’s as I want. And at around $.30 per DVD, I’m probably not going to go broke even if I’m recording 30 DVD’s a day! Luckily, I tend to record only about 9 hours a week max, and often less than that due to repeats or when programming simply skips a week or two or more. Using the 30-second skip that TiVo offers, this becomes closer to 6 hours max, and that’s very easy to keep up with for someone who used to watch probably 7 hours of TV a night as a kid! Even if I increased this programming and didn’t have time to watch everything at home, I could theoretically burn a lot of stuff onto DVD and watch it away from home. I can also take those programs and put them on my Treo 650 for viewing, although the small screen doesn’t make the viewing particularly enjoyable!

Audio, for some reason, has for me become the most complex part of the equation, perhaps because its nature falls somewhere in between text and video in terms of space needed, flexibility, etc., and at the same time it has its own unique qualities. The most useful of those unique qualities is something that’s so obvious that one doesn’t tend to think about it in its full implications; Audio does not require your eyes! Because of this fact, Audio becomes inherently something that you can multitask with as part of other tasks, like driving, working, exercising, etc. Audio can also take the place text. Audio books can provide alternative to hard copies. Even what normally would be seen can be transferred to audio such as radio theater, and entertainment that we would normally associate with TV but which doesn’t lose anything critical, such as stand-up comedy, talk shows, news reporting, etc.

Technically speaking, audio files (especially when compressed using MP3, OGG, AAC, or WMA) are much smaller than video but much bigger than text. As such, they can be handled with some degree of ease. However, even though MP3 players have been around for at least 7 or 8 years now, audio is still wrapped up in large companies trying to protect their revenue streams, just as movies and books are. Early MP3 player manufacturers were sued by the record industry and even today we continue to see efforts among these companies to keep a stranglehold on what they want you to hear when and how. The record industry along with the massive radio station chains pretty much control what you hear on conventional radio, but with satellite radio, internet radio stations, and the flexibility to buy individual songs from artists that don’t have to be officially “approved” by the powers that be, there’s a much bigger choice for consumers. As bloggers have opened up a world of textual content as an alternative to the mainstream media and publishing, the podcasting movement has done something similar around all forms of radio, in particular talk radio but also music. Audio Books are geared to a much narrower audience, but the main online Audio Book publisher, Audible.com, is beholden to similar interests in the publishing arena but if not already being done, we should very soon be seeing unpublished authors recording their own works and publishing them as podcasts or similar audio files.

Next - Audio listening Zen

I’ve never been the most organized person in the world. I’m not the least organized either. Sometimes I think I am an anal-retentive-wannabe. I feel a vague uneasiness when things are out of order, which is most of the time. Not that “out of order” means that things need to be perfect by any stretch. For example, here’s a picture of cubicle at work, which I haven’t actually cleaned for weeks:

(trust me it looks worse in real life!)

When I do clean up around the house, I feel like I can think more clearly. In this way I’m a little schizophrenic, or maybe just stupid. I know I feel better when things are clean and orderly, but I’m just too lazy or distracted to do anything about it! Maybe it’s a chicken and egg sort of thing.

With the age of the personal computer, we have a whole new non-physical realm to deal with in terms of organization. We need to organize information, whether that’s in the way of files, email, bookmarks, whatever. In this area, which I’m admittedly sometimes more familiar with than the physical world, as disturbing as that is to contemplate, I’m not that better. Often it gets to the point where I’m getting warnings of only having 100MB of free space before I think, hmmm, I better clean things up. Certainly having done this for a couple of decades now, I may be a little better than the average person, but it is still a struggle, and one that seems increasingly challenging as my roles in the physical world becomes more substantive.

My main organizational issues right now center around two key parts of my digital life – email and bookmarks. Thankfully when it comes to RSS feeds, Bloglines has allowed me to get pretty organized, although of course I’m woefully behind at actually keeping up with all of the blog entries that I should be reading.

I first started collecting email back in ‘92 when I got my first email account in grad school. Somehow I decided that I wanted to hold onto these emails and because not a whole lot of people had email back then, my correspondence probably amounted to a hundred or so messages per year, maybe less. So every six months or a year I’d spend a half hour saving these to text files with a specific naming format including the name of the recipient, sender, and the date, plus a, b, c, d, etc. for multiple messages for a single day from/to the same person.

This continued until the Internet Bubble of the late 90’s made the flow of email so great that the time needed to do this expanded from 30 minutes to a whole day. So, the last archive of this kind happened sometime in 2000. By that time I had also started using Outlook as my email client and while it was probably just as easy (or difficult) to archive messages than it had been with Pine or Eudora, my laziness had gotten the better of me. Then in 2001 I started dating my now wife, and since then my time for such tasks has decreased even more!

In 2002 I started using a portable device to read email while away from the computer - The Danger Sidekick. Because of T-Mobile’s nonsensical resistance to allowing users to sync their Outlook data on the device, I was at a bit of a disadvantage.

Luckily, last summer, this changed dramatically when I bought my friend’s Treo 600. Around this same time I found a company (1and1)that among other things hosts outlook data so that you can access it remotely either via “Outlook Web Access” (a web interface to Outlook), or via an actual Outlook client or via a regular IMAP email client. 1and1 had by far the cheapest plan at only $6.99 per month and so far I’ve been pretty satisfied. After doing some searching, I finally settled on an excellent IMAP client for the Treo called ChatterEmail that let me synch whatever folders I wanted to. It’s still not practical to keep thousands of full messages from years of correspondence, it isn’t impossible. But ChatterEmail doesn’t use external cards the way some others do (Snappermail comes to mind). Still, for my needs, I felt ChatterEmail’s advantages outweighed this disadvantage, especially since it’s rare that I go searching for email that’s older than a year.

So, now that everything was more or less set up, what did I do? Not much. I know many people use an extensive folder system, even directing their email into various folders when they are received. I was never that big a user of folders, although I did use them in a minor way. So, recently, this lack of using such a powerful email organizational feature was gnawing at me and I figured I needed to come up with some strategic ways of using folders. What I came up with, ironically, involves more manual work. But at least it promotes organization. Basically I let things lie in the inbox for a while – sometimes it could be for an hour, sometimes for days or even weeks – but eventually sooner or later I have to go through and “clean house” which involves just going through the last umpteen messages and deleting stuff I know I don’t want to keep and taking other stuff and putting them in the appropriate folder. Luckily, I keep most personal mail from friends and family in my inbox, so don’t need to anything with these. This folder is synched with my Treo. I keep the last 3-6 months of messages in my inbox, and archive the rest going back a year or so to a separate folder which is still accessible on my hosted exchange account (but not the Treo). Last night I went through all the messages in my inbox and this archived inbox and created three or four folders for additional subjects that I figure I might need to go back and look at some time in the future: blog-related stuff, registration information, online purchases, posts with links to various references that I eventually want to read relating to photography, the Treo, etc. Currently I’m not synching these, but I figure eventually I can download these to the Treo very easily as needed.

Aside from all this on my hosted exchange account, I have some earlier Outlook data that I didn’t transfer because I was worried about using up the 500MB that the account gave me when I signed up. Even though they increased it to 1GB, I’m still a little reticent if for no other reason then having to go through an additional three or four years worth of email in that file. I guess eventually I should go ahead and put the stuff up there…

I’m surprised that there aren’t more tools out there to help people archive old email, and even keep it around for searching purposes. There’s a lot of information contained in years of email messages that could be useful to people. Old addresses, phone numbers, names, etc. It’s very easy to look up my name on the Internet and find up-to-date information about me because I have this blog and post messages online in various places. But most of my friends don’t have this kind of net-visibility, and so if I lose track of someone and they change their contact info, it’s sometimes next to impossible to find them again sometimes, unless of course they find me from something I’ve written and send me a line, as has happened a few times in the last year or so. The ability to create an archival structured document or set of documents, like a bulletin board with threads (something maybe along the lines that Gmail does?), could be really powerful. The main challenge in my mind would be not chaining it to a single program. Maybe creating something in xml or a similar standardized protocol so that developers could create many different viewers for it.

As I mentioned above, bookmarks (or “favorites” in MS parlance) are my next target area for organization. Again, I used to be better about these when there didn’t seem to be as much useful stuff to link to. I still have the remnants of a decent system bookmarks categorized into folders. However, I’m sure many of these are outdated – either long gone or simply out of date or not of interest to me anymore.

For a while now, I’ve been using My Yahoo! as a way to have an online store of bookmarks that I could access from wherever I am, and also to synch my bookmarks from home to work. It also got around what had become a separation of different bookmarking systems between MS and Netscape, although luckily these systems never got incompatible enough to really hamper the transfer of data from one system to the other.

Since becoming more involved with RSS feeds and using Bloglines as a way to manage the feeds I read, I have been yearning for a similar system for bookmark management. I have lots of feeds where there is some article that has so much detail that I either want to keep it for later reference, or simply to read it at a later date (because it’s too long for my slow reading speed, making it necessary to set aside a good chunk of time to read it). Bloglines allows you to clip individual entries and put them into hierarchical folders. This is great for managing such stuff, but unfortunately its interface is not all that friendly to mobile devices (even though it has a specifically mobile version of its site, some functionality is missing and they haven’t made any improvements for at least 6 months, despite clamoring from many users), and besides, you can’t insert your own links. For example, there may be a great entry by a blogger that links to something of interest, but also contains many other links. In Bloglines you can only save that entire entry, not just the link of interest.

I have played a bit with sites like del.icio.us, and furl, but it seems to me that they are either just inelegant compared to Bloglines and/or your browser’s bookmark system, or their interface is more about “social bookmarking” (sharing links with others), than it is about managing your own. There does seem to be some developers using the del.icio.us API to allow one to import and export your bookmarks, so I will need to look into this. It does seem a little odd that this isn’t a feature of del.icio.us to begin with, but whatever. I think this is just one of those areas thats just going to be a constant work in progress.

But then again, isn’t organization constant work? You can set systems up so that future work is minimized, but there’s always some work to do, and due to all the new kinds of information out there, people will always need to do the work to figure out what the best ways to organize things will be. For example, in the last five years or so, people have been able to rip their music to MP3, and this requires organization both within the ID3 tags and possibly also within a folder structure. But MP3’s are just the beginning. Photo collections are yet another big organizational task now that digital cameras have become affordable to most. Now that digital video has become more accessible to the masses with the proliferation of processors and hard drives that can handle the much more demanding content, this stuff will need to be organized as well. The next jump up to high-definition digital video will be even more demanding but eventually will be available to anyone with $500 to spare.

I think all of this begs a separate but related question: do we continue to manage all this ourselves on our local systems? Obviously the push has been more and more towards storing these things online, at least as an important option. This is being done not only so that one can share the content and information, but simply to access it no matter where you are, as long as you can connect to the Internet – a feat that is becoming almost ubiquitously easy, although you might need some hard currency to do it in third world countries. Having all your data online is of concern to privacy advocates and to simply to those who are paranoid about losing that data. Privacy is a valid concern for many, especially considering recent events around the T-Mobile Hacker’s breaking in to the Danger servers and getting access to Paris Hilton’s personal info on her Sidekick. And as always, it’s important to make copies of your data for local archiving in case of connections or servers going down, as they will do from time to time. It may be wise for such companies as hosting companies and the like to establish not only their own backup systems but backups that allow their own customers to maintain an up-to-date copy of what’s on the server. Perhaps offering this as special software would actually decrease their backup storage resources required, although it would at the same time increase their bandwidth usage costs.

Right now we are still at the beginning of the information age when it comes to information management. Those who are tech-savvy can manage their information with a good deal of effort and planning. Those who aren’t tech-savvy have much more of a challenge. Companies have by and large not seized the opportunity to cater to both sets of users to provide them with a much more seamless way to manage all this stuff both locally and online. Certainly we are moving in this direction, but I think we still have a long way to go before the average non-techy can simply have all their data organized and managed, backed up, and synched to whatever computer (or portable device) they happen to want to use, view, share, change, etc. at any given time.

On January 3rd, just as CES 2005 was getting under way, TiVo announced TiVo ToGo, a service they’ve been talking about for around a year now. As many of you know, this service will allow you to transfer your TiVo programs or movies to a computer, a portable media player, and eventually to a DVD. At least that’s the theory. In practice, things may be a little more complex. TiVo ToGo has an inherent problem, as far as I’m concerned. The problem is speed, both figuratively and literally:

Firstly, this feature has taken forever to get to TiVo owners. Ostensibly this was because TiVo had to allay the fears of the movie industry, TV networks, etc., by creating a DRM system whereby the content could not be easily copied and distributed. To do this, TiVo employs a code or “access key” that you type in when playing the content outside of the the TiVo box. This code is specific to you and your TiVo. If you then distribute that content on the internet, it has a signature pointing right back at you. While I appreciate that TiVo is trying to work with content providers to come up with a compromise that will help both their customers and the content providers, I think in the end this is crippling them, as TiVo ToGo was in development for at least year.

Now that TiVo ToGo has been announced, it is still going to take weeks before all TiVo boxes have the service. Some types of TiVo’s (ones that record to DVD), will not see the capability for what will probably be months. And DirecTV Tivo boxes simply will not offer the service, just as they have not offered TiVo’s home networking features.

Finally, the issue of speed is inherent in the actual functionality of TiVo ToGo. Even at the lowest quality of recording, an hour of TiVo programming takes up about 1 GB of storage. How do you get your content from your TiVo to your computer? You have to go through the USB port on the TiVo. You can either hook a wireless or wired Ethernet adapter to it, or potentially even hook it directly to a laptop. The problem, though, is that no matter what it’s hooked to, it is still a USB 1.1 port, the older type which was superseded with the ten times faster USB 2.0 around three years ago. This bottleneck means that no TiVo content can travel faster than about 4Mbps (bursts go up to 12Mbps, but average transfer speed is much slower), or about 1.8GB per hour. So, with this speed you can transfer a 2-hour movie in a little over an hour AT THE WORST QUALITY. Most people will want to record at least some content at the best quality level, which is about 4GB per hour, and this will take a whopping 2+ hours to transfer per hour of show, or somewhere close to 4 hours for an average movie. Maybe I’m spoiled, but this seems like an inordinate amount of time, and during this transfer, your computer will slow down to the speed of your computer from 10 years ago - so slow you will have to set transfers before going to sleep at night. Now if you’re transferring this to a laptop that you’re bringing with you, you can just wake up the next morning, throw the laptop in its bag and head out the door. But what if you don’t have a laptop and instead want to send your programs to a portable media player or to DVD? Well, you’re now looking at more time. Maybe another 10-15 minutes per hour of video to send to a DVD, or another 3-5 minutes per hour of video if you can transfer your files to your portable media player via USB 2.0 or Firewire. In any case, this starts to become a real hassle at some point unless you’re just transferring a couple of programs at a time. For a portable media players, you will probably also want to decrease the quality of the program even further in order to fit more onto what could be only 20GB of hard drive space, which means an additional conversion factor. TiVo does have plans to upgrade their USB to the significantly faster USB 2.0, but there is no immediate timeline, which probably means we shouldn’t expect anything until at least next year.

I happen to own one of those TiVo’s with a DVD recorder - the Humax DRT-800. I can record shows directly from the TiVo to DVD-R or DVD-RW and it takes all of 15 minutes for an hour’s show at the highest quality setting. This unit costs a bit more than an similarly sized TiVo and of course the discs cost money too, but at least the DVD-RW’s can be reused and I have much more portability (due to increased speed) than TiVo ToGo. Perhaps this is why TiVo has decided to not push their updates yet to those who own DVD recorders like the Humax.

If TiVo were to upgrade their USB functionality to 2.0, then this would become much faster and easier. However, it seems that the easier you make it to copy content, the more nervous content creators get. I think there’s actually an inherent conflict of interest between the attitudes of content creators and their customers. These companies want to be able to parcel out their content in a way that generates the most revenue as possible, and they see this being done only through commercial-filled programming, or through selling recordings on DVD or CD, or via subscription-based pipelines where part of that subscription fee is funneled back to them. Likewise, they would like for you to have to buy their content multiple times. Paying your satellite or cable company, or just paying more for products which are advertised during a program’s airing is only the first payment. If you also want to hold onto that show on a DVD, you get to pay all over again! Because the DVD format was created in order to prevent copying (albeit the scheme was subsequently defeated), you have to jump through some hoops if you want to then transfer that same content onto something that doesn’t play dvds themselves, but can play the dvd video files - like portable media players.

Music companies want you to pay for the song you hear on the radio by charging the radio network, which then compensates by getting advertisers to buy ads which in turn drives up prices for their products. Even if there are no ads, like with satellite radio, you are still paying a monthly fee, which is in part going to back to these content providers. Then if you want to have that recording at your disposal to play any time at a good quality, you need to pay an additional fee to buy it on CD, or more recently on the internet. But if you pay for it on the internet, say via iTunes, you then can only play it on a limited number of devices. Finally, if you want to hear the song as a ringtone on your phone, you are charged yet again for this same content.

TiVo’s CEO, Michael Ramsy, has finally “left” TiVo, although he is still remains as Chairman of the Board. Some believe he was pushed to leave due to the poor performance of TiVo’s stock. I’m no expert in the stock market, but I can certainly understand why TiVo’s stock has diminished in value, even with the advent of TiVo ToGo and an increased TiVo subscriber base. TiVo, it seems, took the road of trying to placate content providers and potential competitors as opposed to just going it alone. Alas, in business, or in particular in the entertainment business, this seems not to work. Instead of full cooperation for its trying not to step on any toes, the only thing it’s gotten is a lack of actual litigation. On the other hand, you have companies like NBC trying to defeat TiVo’s functionality by starting and ending shows differently then their schedules indicate. Other channels, like Comedy Central in particular, refuse to code their programs as repeats or first run, making the process of recoding a series that much more difficult. Even partners like DirectTV seem to be backstabbing TiVo. TiVo partnered with DirctTV so that they could build combo TiVo/DirecTV receivers (DirecTiVo’s as they are called) that would work in an integrated way. But now it looks like DirectTV may not be a TiVo partner in the long run as they are coming out with their own DVR that will compete not only against the TiVo hadware, but the TiVo subscription service as well.

I’m worried about TiVo’s future. That’s why I’ve refused to buy their lifetime subscription. I have no idea whether TiVo will be around in two years, when such a subscription starts to pay off, but more importantly I don’t know if TiVo will have lowered their prices or morphed into something else, or whether other options will become available that make TiVo not the best choice for me. I want TiVo to succeed, I really do, but I think that there needs to be some radical shifts in TiVo’s way of doing business:

1. First thing, as I’ve noted, is to stop kissing up so much to all the content companies. TiVo tried being nice and it hasn’t gotten them very much at all. It’s time to say “screw it!” and not try to get permission for everything they do. This has slowed down their development considerably, and caused them to fall behind some other hardware and service providers so they are no longer on the cutting edge.
2. “Placeshifting” - in other words portability - is the new key. TiVo was revolutionary in letting people “timeshift” in order to watch what they wanted when they wanted. Five or so years later, though, technology has progressed to a point where video has become more and more portable. Portable Media Devices are an up and coming device category (when Apple finally releases one, they will truly be mainstream), laptops are ubiquitous, portable DVD players have gotten incredibly cheap, and PDA’s, and even smartphones have become powerful enough to handle video. Part of making a functionality “easy” for people to use it, is to make it practicle, and speed is a big part of this. The fact that a driver update could make a USB 1.1 port into a USB 2.0 port and thus provide 10 times the speed or more, should mean that this update should be getting priority over most other projects. During this entire year between TiVo ToGo’s first being mentioned and it’s finally being released, why wasn’t part of TiVo’s resources put to updating this and if they were, what on earth could be taking so long?
3. Placeshifting in reverse - just as people want to take their TiVo’d programs with them on the road, there’s a definite need expressed to take content we get elsewhere and send it back to our TiVo so that we can play it on the larger screens in our living rooms. Already third parties have come in to allow for this kind of functionality. I see more and more of these “wireless multimedia boxes” that allow for bi-directional communication between a TV and a computer over a wirless network (using the faster 802.11G) or more direct connection. What would you send back to a TiVo? How about video clips you find on the internet that you want to share with the whole family, or content licensed in Creative Commons or Public Domain? A home video that you like to watch and share with friends a bunch of times without having to risk wearing the tape out? There are tons of reasons.
   4) Work more with hackers and third-party software developers and open functionality up to all users - TiVo has been more friendly to hackers than most companies, I’ll admit. TiVo’s are built with the Linux operating system, a favorite of hackers, and with hardware that can be removed and tinkered with fairly easily. This is great for hackers and tech-savvy people, and hackers have created programs that greatly expand the functionality of your TiVo. For example, one can basically operate one’s TiVo remotely over the internet with one such program. But just installing such programs requires some computer hardware and software skills that that probably a vast majority of TiVo owners don’t have and won’t bother to learn. TiVo needs to take these great applications and make them available as real parts of the TiVo system to all users. Maybe part of the reluctance in the past was that these programs were developed in an open-source environment that would not want TiVo to charge for them. When TiVo introducted it’s Home Networking feature, it charged for it and only after some time realized that it was not going to get enough people to pay an additional fee over TiVo’s original fee (which some people object to anyway) and until last. Maybe now that TiVo realizes they aren’t going to be able to charge additional fees for added functionality, they will offer gratis something which they are getting for very low development costs (since third-parties are developing these programs) to all their customers.

Microsoft recently started providing a version of Windows called Windows XP for Media Center Edition that provides DVR functionality, and many other companies are coming out with DVR’s, multimedia boxes, or even pumped up portable hard drives that all provide functionality that TiVo doesn’t. TiVo really needs to catch up, or they will eventually be relegated to AOL status - marketed to a diminishing pool of completely non-technical people who don’t mind paying a premium for an interface that dumbs down everything for them. I don’t think AOL is doing all that well these days. Then again neither is TiVo, or at least not according to their stock price!

The latest new feature we’ve heard about from TiVo is an high definition-capable TiVo, but apparently this won’t be available until 2006. What I want to know is what the point of such an announcement is if the product won’t be release for a year or more? Take a lesson from Apple and surprise people with new products instead of telling customers how long they will have to wait as well as notifying competitors way in advance of your plans so that they can come along and trump you - which it seems is becoming increasingly easy due to how slowly TiVo introduces new products and functionality. I personally have an HDTV and at this point my only hope is that another company like Humax will come out with an HD-compatible TiVo, preferably one with DVD-writable capability. Whether TiVo creates this or a third-party partner I guess doesn’t matter that much if customers are still going to buy a TiVo subscription. Who knows, maybe TiVo’s real purpose in announcing this so long before it becomes a reality is to actually motivate current or partners to develop their own HDTiVo’s?

What is so frustrating about all of this is that TiVo was the first out there with set-top DVR technology and so basically revolutionized how we watch TV. They’ve provided at least somewhat of a lightening rod for content companies, allowing us to just sit back and record things the way we wanted to (although this may be starting to change). Whether they go all out the way I wish they would, or simply continue to play the middle-man between the end user and the content providers, they are a major force that is at least trying to provide as much content in as flexible a way as possible to as many people as possible. If they get usurped by individual cable companies and satellite companies, this flexibility will be constrained even further since these many cable and satellite providers are also owners of much of content themselves. Microsoft, on the other hand, so far is not a major owner of content. Because of its size, it could wield real influence and be able to handle whatever litigation content companies throw at it, but it is unlikely to wage those kinds of battles. With its own music stores, DRM support, and history of monopolistic practices, it would be a shame if they were to replace TiVo as the dominant player in the DVR market.

In the end, TiVo may need to really do some radical things. It seems like they may be starting to go in this direction based on some reporting from PVRBlog about a Home Media Engine that will be in a future system update. It will theoretically provide the third-party development I talk about above. Getting this kind of software functionality added as well as providing USB 2.0, enhanced wireless speeds (802.11G or even 802.11N when it is standardized), and even some new hardware features or options (Ethernet ports, firewire, more types of audio and video input and output, more USB/Firewire ports for hot-swappable external storage, etc), will be key in keeping TiVo from becoming a has-been. TiVo should also upgrade its hardware in general which is beginning to really feel its age not being as fast to get things done as it could. TiVo has become a familiar name and even a new verb in the language, but it can’t just rely solely on this reputation and rest on its laurels.

First, let me apologize for the lack of content here recently. I was traveling for the holidays, developed a cold that made doing anything a real pain, then came back and have been trying to catch up on reading all the gadget news. With CES just ending, it’s been a landslide of content. I just figure it’s still going to be a while, so I want to start writing something. I thought I’d give you a few quick items that I’m planning on writing about in more depth in come days. I figure posting a little bit about them now will give you at least something and it will keep me honest! The theme is definitely content overload, as you will see:

I happened across a program/service that is supposed to act like TiVo but for your radio. If you are a big talk-radio fan, or just a radio fan in general, this might prove really useful. I’m a big NPR addict myself, but I just don’t get the time to listen to the shows I want to all the time. I get busy and it’s really a shame they haven’t come out with something like this already, it would be a lot easier than a TiVo because you don’t have to deal with video and my sense is that scheduling is much more regular for radio. It does this by listening to streaming Internet radio broadcasts and recording these as mp3 files. It will even send them to iTunes so if you have an iPod all the better. The application is called Replay Radio and they have a demo version if you want to try it out. I am probably going to purchase the full version and give a more detailed piece about soon.

Speaking of TiVo, there’s a lot of TiVo news recently, most notably about the newest feature called TiVo ToGo, which will enable people who can use this service to download their TiVo content to their laptop, portable media player, or even to DVD. However, there are some inherent problems that I see with the implementation, which in my mind make it more trouble then it’s worth.

As I think I’ve mentioned here before, I’ve only recently started using TiVo myself, but I purchased a TiVo unit that also records to DVD. In fact, it does so much more easily than via TiVo ToGo. The unit is the Humax DRT-800. I’ve only seen one review of this unit, but I figured I would write a review myself that concentrates on the dvd writing part of the picture and the other things that separate this unit from your average TiVo.

It occurred to me recently how we have this silly game between technology companies on the one hand and hackers on the other. The technology companies produce a gadget or software that is really useful, like the Treo, or the iPod, or TiVo, etc.

These companies often have to play a careful game with content giants because that’s what a lot of them are about – the iPod is about music, TiVo about TV and movies, etc. They want to provide something that consumers will find useful and that they will be able to use in as many ways as they can but the content companies are afraid that this will translate into mass copying of all their copyrighted materials causing people to stop buying these at the prices that keep these industries saturated with money. It is that money that offers both a stick and carrot to the technology companies. They see the stick of litigation and regulation, and the carrot of simply vast quantities of money that could potentially help with their bottom line in some way.

Then there are the hackers (and when I say “hackers” I mean anyone who is actively trying to disassemble technology in ways that they feel will benefit them and others, no matter the intended use of the technology or laws prohibiting what they want to use it for) who think it is everyone’s right to be able to use the technology in a completely free way. There should be no copy protection or other hindrances to viewing content that they feel should be free or almost free in the first place.

The battle, then is not really between hackers and technology companies. Tech companies are simply caught in the crossfire because it is in their products where the battle takes place.

I understand both points of view, but the extremism on either end can get a bit ridiculous. The movie, music, and publishing industries have consistently been against technologies that would give almost any power to consumers in deciding what they want to watch or listen to, how, and when. They tried killing the VCR, which ended up providing movie companies with untold billions. They tried killing MP3 player technology and file sharing, but Apple’s iTunes has shown that giving users the ability to buy and download individual songs for a low price is something that can generate revenue as well. In general, these industries have been fighting a very defensive battle against technology and even their own consumer in the ultimately doomed goal of maintaining all control over their content. Technology has also provided a cheap means for producing high quality audio and video recordings, and so there’s been an unleashing of independent product that sells for much less than the traditional stuff from bloated industries which need to support legions of lawyers (litigating for their copyright infringements), huge marketing campaigns (becoming less necessary as the Internet provides huge word-of-mouth networks, and the ability to reach vast numbers of people with little or no cost), and huge executive salaries (not to mention ridiculously large salaries for actors and other performers). Much of the independently produced content can also arguably be considered a lot better than the mass-market stuff because it is not tightly controlled by marketing departments employing focus groups. It more truly reflects the true vision and creativity of those who made it.

Hackers have arisen partially as a response to the arrogance and greed of the content companies – in addition to their naiveté in regards to technology. But the fact of the matter is that all too often they are simply creating a means for people to copy things illegally. Some times the laws are still in dispute and/or they don’t make sense. However, when you buy a piece of content with clearly defined restrictions against copying, and then make copies for all your friends, the charts only see the profit from one sale, when it was obviously good enough for many more than that. Thus the artist is deemed to be not as worthy as he really is in such a sales-centric industry, and he is less likely to be supported in a similar type of work in the future. Hackers have a kind of skewed “civil disobedience” mentality that argues that if the laws are stupid and can be circumvented easily without what they consider real harm to anyone except for the companies that they deem as evil, than they have every right, perhaps even a duty, to break these laws. In the same way, there has developed this outrage to anything a company does to try to hold on to its customers, really any hindrance that it puts on its customers to leave them. So contracts that hold people to a regular subscription payment (with a large cancellation payment tacked on) are condemned. However, this goes even further with the indignation even over the lack of a way to unsubscribe from a service (whether or not a fee is levied) via an online button. Apparently having to make a phone call which might take 20 minutes is too much of an imposition. When some functionality is removed or not allowed in the first place (while still being possible for people who understand the technology), the hackers are incensed. It’s not enough for them to be able to hack sometimes, but instead they feel it’s necessary for such questionable functionality to be made easily accessible by all.

There is also this kind of weird “don’t ask don’t tell” relationship between technology companies and the hackers. Technology companies are straddling a fence. They want to show publicly (and privately) that they are all for keeping the content companies’ materials free from being illegally distributed, so they simply don’t make this possible for the average user. However, hackers (and really anyone who does a little research by reading online forums or mailing lists) can and do easily find ways to circumvent these controls. Their seems to be a wink and a nod in many cases as the technology companies don’t go the extra step of filling holes in copy-protection security schemes and thus defeating the hacker’s abilities, or at least making them jump through more and more hurdles - at least in most cases. Perhaps they understand that it is ultimately a losing battle and one that does not justify lots of resources. Perhaps it is partly because they themselves are hackers in one way or another and they really don’t want to totally defeat this group even if they could, because they know that consumers crave flexibility and control, and that limiting these things will ultimately kill their products.

iTunes, Audible.com, CDBaby, and CinemaNow, among others, have shown that people are willing to spend money on content if they feel it is a reasonably priced. The technology that has made copying possible has also meant, as I mentioned before, that many more people can create music, video, and of course simple written words, such as you see here, for a mass audience at a very low production and distribution cost. This overabundance of content shows that people want to see a large variety of different types of content, not the very strict areas that media companies think will sell the best, but it also inherently decreases the individual value of a piece of content because there is so much of it to chose from. Because these other choices are growing in number and are available at a much lower price that doesn’t involve voiding one’s warranty or breaking the law, they become more and more attractive. The large media companies need to understand this and they need to do something radical or else they will fade into nothing. This may not happen tomorrow, but it will happen. Of course it will mean that they will have to get a lot leaner. Justifying huge salaries at the expense of incredibly inflated costs is becoming more obvious and less accepted by the average consumer, who would rather support the actual creator of the content and not minions of lawyers and marketers. Neither do many want to keep content creators swimming in money, no matter their adoration. People want to support the artists they admire so that they can continue to churn out the stuff they like, not to support lavish lifestyles or expensive drug habits, the latter of which often sadly seems to come hand in hand with sudden vast wealth, especially at younger ages.

I suppose both sides of the coin have a role to play, and maybe even hackers will become less of an issue if media companies become savvier about consumers. In the end, we are still a capitalist society that bows to market forces. If people get pissed off enough at media companies as more independently produced work is released at a much lower costs with word of mouth on the internet eclipsing the now skipped over commercials (thanks to TiVo) on TV, these large companies will eventually implode. Their desperate attempts to control their content completely do not need to be battled by illegal means, because eventually newer, cheaper, independent content will supersede it in popularity. Certainly, if the knowledge and desire is there to “hack” a technology without using that hack to create illegal copies, but rather simply to allow a purchaser to viewed/listen to/read a piece of content in a way that’s more convenient, I’m all for it. Otherwise, I think some of the less reasonable hackers need to have some self restraint and instead of using illegal means to obtain some content they want but just think should cost less, they should vote with their feet by simply supporting the companies, artists, and industries that they feel are “getting it right” by allowing for greater flexibility and lower prices, and not buy, and not watch, listen to, or read, content that is from companies that are clueless. Otherwise, it is just taking the law into ones own hands. Certainly we can all agree that it’s a positive thing to legally fight against laws we feel are unjust, and Electronic Frontier Foundation and others have done a tremendous job in this regard and have fought to keep many consumers’ rights intact. The same money that has kept these large industries afloat for so long also helps them keep their stranglehold on these laws to some extent, since laws are written and/or made into laws to begin with by politicians and politicians need money to fund their campaigns for reelection. So in some ways that works against the freedom that many of us would like to see, but this just means that individuals should speak out more (as opposed to expressing themselves by ignoring the law altogether), and financially support those entities, like the EFF, that are trying to legally fight these battles for us as consumers.