There’s been lots of discussion lately about the Pre syncing with iTunes despite the fact that iTunes is an Apple product meant to only work with Apple products (iPods and iPhones).

However, there’s a new post over at Pre Central about how the thousands of applications (really web pages made to look like applications, called “web apps”) that were developed for the iPhone during the whole year between the first generation iPhones and the release of 3rd party applications via Apple’s App Store.  These applications work fine on the Pre because the browser on it and on the iPhone use the same core code.

Many Apple fanb… er, fans, are calling the iTunes sync a unsportsmanlike piggyback ride, or worse, “stealing”!  Of course, iTunes is an Apple product and it can do whatever it wants with it, but it cannot do anything about the thousands of web apps that exist for the iPhone since these are made by third parties.  I suppose it could prevent the Pre’s browser from accessing the online catalog of these apps, but doing so I think would probably make them look even more closed and vindictive in this age of greater platform openness - heck Palm just released the source code for their WebOS operating system!  Oh, and a hack to the browser could easily work around said blockage.

It’s a testament to Apple that so far we haven’t seen them react more forcefully, beligerently, against Palm.  Then again, I think, or at least hope, that the growing sense that people should be able to use the software and the tools in the way they want despite whatever the almost-never-read EULA states, means that companies are less likely to attempt blatent blockages for fear of bad press/bad online buzz.

What do you think, is Palm a scrappy company that is doing everything (even breaking a few rules) to compete against the 50,000 lb goliath, or is it just stealing Apple’s IP?

Still, I think the comparisons are a little unfair even if they have to be uttered, especially when it comes to the Palm Pre’s App Catalog.  The catalog was launched with only 18 applications and now has 30.  Almost doubling the number of apps in a week isn’t too bad, but this compared against Apple’s current App Store of 50,000 applications makes the Pre’s selection look pathetic.

The problem is that the comparison is between a phone that has just come out, and one that’s had time to mature.  Of course that IS what the choices are right now, but I guess what I don’t understand is why Palm is expected to have as mature a marketplace (or anything even close) as the iPhone’s on it’s first week out the door.  Here are a few points to this end that I think the current press is ignoring about the Pre:

1. The iPhone had no app catalog period (not 18 apps or 30) for the first year of its existence.
2. The shear number of applications for a phone doesn’t mean all that much.  To be sure, the App Store has a great selection of useful applications, but if half or more of these apps are iFarts, how useful is that total number?
3. If you were a developer, is it a “no brainer,” as Leo Laporte said, to develop for the iPhone vs the Palm Pre?  Well, in one sense you might think it would be - you have a proven platform and an established marketplace for your product.  On the other hand, you have 49,999 other apps to compete with.  For those with the resources, the obvious choice will be to develop for both platforms, but for those who don’t, wouldn’t you be much more noticed in a smaller collection of apps?
4. So many of the articles that I take issue with are trying to couch the Pre and the iPhone as being in some kind of mortal death match where only one company can win.  According to these articles, Palm needs to be as good as or better than the iPhone in every way in order to prove itself and go head to head with the iPhon in order to “survive.”  But is that really true?  I don’t think so.  All they really need to do to survive is to produce a successful product - one that sells well, generates increasing interest over time, and slowly grows in marketshare.  Whether a future Pre will ever get close to the iPhone in sales numbers is doubtful, but why is this necessary?

The Smartphone market is growing every year, and they still take up a relatively small percentage of total phones sold, which means plenty of room for all manufacturers to grow.  It’s actually better for consumers to have more choices.  Some authers seem to think that having more than a couple of platforms of phone OS will lead to chaos and confusion.  Yet on the PC side we have Apple, Windows, and Linux.  In the automibile industry there are lots of different “platforms” - SUV’s, compacts, minivans, motorcycles, sports cars, etc.  No one is confused, rather people are happy to have more choices, not fewer.  Competition makes these companies work harder to make better products for all of us.

The one thing that didn’t turn out as well as expected was my phone’s data capabilities.  In the scheme of things this is of course a very minor annoyance, but for those of us who are gadget and technology-obsessed, I thought it was still an interesting tidbit to write about.  My phone in general was not working well.  It said I had a data connection but when I tried to browse to a web site or even retrieve email, it would sit there just trying to connect.  I did manage to make one phone call early on, but when my wife tried later in the concert, she had no luck.  Even my text message I sent in the middle of the concert didn’t go through!

I had originally wanted to post some pictures “live” on facebook, and maybe even some videos to my qik.com group.  But the phone problems thwarted me and my phone became basically a $300 pocket-watch for most of the concert.

Later it dawned on me (ok, so I’m a little slow!) that the reason for all these problems was undoubtedly because the cell towers around the Mall were overwhelmed by the hundreds of thousands of people, most of whom at cell phones and probably half of whom were trying to text, email, send pictures, browse to their facebook or twitter accounts, etc., etc.  I’d never really thought about how population density needs to be taken into consideration when deciding where to place cell towers and how many to place.  Obviously these towers have a limit to how many connections they can handle, and hundreds of thousands is well above that limit!  What’s interesting is actually dealing with these temporary surges in population density.  These surges are not very often and they don’t happen (predictably) except for in a few places, like the Washington DC Mall and other large public squares. I would think that for such events, the carriers would be able to set up temporary mobile towers in order to handle such increased bandwidth, and for all I know they did, but even so, it didn’t seem to help much.

I wonder if the new 4G technologies of Wimax and LTE will have higher bandwidth per tower, because they certainly are tauting their longer range (and thus the ability to serve larger areas with just one tower) as part of their advantage.  So, hopefully if the bandwidth remains the same for these, they won’t be using these longer-range capabilities as an excuse to remove towers in order to save money, or we all may be experiencing the types of outages I did yesterday on a regular basis!

Update:  I just saw this article on the NY Times which is about just this issue.  According to the article, carriers have been preparing for this and are adding radios to cell towers.  Maybe these radios had not yet been turned on by yesterday, but if they had, then our experience at least shows that they are woefully inadequate to account for the increase in bandwidth.  At least, that is, for our carrier, Sprint…

I originally chose BC when there weren’t any really mature blogging platforms, and BC had just as many if not more features than many of its competitors. Also the idea of setting up my own blogging software and having to tweak it at that time, while not a big deal, seemed like enough of a nuisance to at least be a factor in my decision.

Over the years, BC came out with new functionality, new widgets, and whole new administrative platforms. The amount of personal attention was also great. They are still a good choice for a segment of the blogging or potentially-blogging community.

Still, there are a few things that have motivated me to move to Wordpress, and I finally made the jump, after lots of prep work on the back end over the last month or so. I am still a relative newbie at Wordpress and will be continuing to add new content and functionality, tweaking the look of things, etc., etc., over the next few weeks or even months. But I believe with this new blogging software will help motivate me to get back into the rhythm of blogging, even if it’s just to post a link and a short paragraph here and there as I come across something interesting and want to share my thoughts.

For those of you who don’t know much about blogging, Wordpress is an open-source application that one can install on a huge number of hosts out there. You can easily take your entire blog, save it to your local computer, then reimport all that content on a new host if you decide to go from one to another. The software stays the same. The software is also very easy to use, with lots of customization via “plugins” and “themes” to change the look and add functionality. There are lots of these available for free, plus you can program your own if you are so inclined, or just tweak the ones that are available. Some of these plugins are extremely powerful, adding very significant new functionality. Since the software is open-source, it will never go away due to a company going out of business or switching tactics, and becuase it is so popular, your data is in a format that can be imported into many other software platforms if you ever choose a different one. And if it isn’t now, chances are that some developer will create a migration tool for such a huge market.

Its popularity as well as the open-source nature of WordPress ensures many advantages, as well as a few small burdens which other blogging platforms, especially ones that do your hosting for you as well, do not. For anyone with technical savvy, such software is a pretty obvious choice, although like I did five years ago, you might decide on a solution that avoids the added work of installing and configuring such software simply due to time constraints and a busy life. WordPress does have a fully-hosted version as well, similar to Blogger and Blog-City, and like the others it comes in both free and paid, more premium versions. If you ever want to get a feel for these different software platforms, the best place to start would be to create one of these free accounts on the various choices and play to see which one fits your style best.

I didn’t use eBay again for another year or two. We did trade negative feedbacks for each other, but in any case, I think it’s a little odd that if a buyer rips you off, you can’t mark them as being just as dishonest as a bad seller. Both sellers and buyers have responsibilities and you can usually tell if a seller gave a negative mark just in retaliation to a buyers if that buyer has an otherwise prestine record…

Quoting from techDirt:

eBay has been making some changes lately that aren’t sitting well with eBay sellers. First, it announced fee changes that initially were promoted as “lower fees,” but the details showed were only lower for goods that didn’t sell. The fees on sold goods were actually higher. Now, the company has banned sellers from giving “negative” feedback on buyers.

Perhaps it was the naïve assumption that most products in Whole Foods were healthy that made me a bit lax about looking at ingredients lists, or perhaps it was just that Whole Foods did not have ingredients listed for most of their prepared foods until recently. In any case, I’ve been reading these labels recently and have come to the conclusion that just about everything that Whole Foods makes (there prepared foods you buy for heating up at home as well as their hot-bar items) has canola oil in it! It is already very difficult to find packaged products containing an oil other than canola or a similar vegetable oil in them, but seemingly this is also the case for many non-packaged items as well.

Now, many of you may be saying “so what, isn’t it the saturated fat that’s bad, not the unsaturated stuff”? Well, not exactly. Check out Gary Taubes’ “Good Calories Bad Calories” and you will see a great outline about how this myth came to be. Even the traditionalists have disembarked from the pure “eat more unsaturated fat” to just “eat more MONO-unsaturated fat.” Monounsaturated fat (MUFA) is the type of fat that olive oil is primarily made up of and presumably the healthfulness of the Mediterranean diet is based on this. A diet high in polyunsaturated fats (PUFA’s) has been linked, albeit tenuously, to increased risk of cancer. It’s true that Canola oil does have a decent amount of MUFA (60%), but it also has a lot of PUFA (almost 40%).

There are other potential health concerns specific to Canola. Apparently processing of the oil involves a “deodorization” process which converts omega-3 fatty acids into harmful trans-fatty acids.

Of course not everyone will believe that Canola oil is unhealthful. There’s certainly no incontrovertible truth and intelligent people can still disagree about whether canola oil increases risk factors or decreases them. Still, because this oil is a bit controversial, especially among what is probably one of Whole Foods’ target audiences, my thought is it would behoove them to use an oil that is less controversial.

Olive oil is seen almost universally as, if not a perfect oil, at least one that is acceptably low in potential health risks. The advocates of the Mediterranean diet of course contend that the MUFA’s in it are exceedingly healthy, as are its low levels of saturated fatty acids (SFA’s). Those on the other side of the spectrum who believe that SFA’s are healthy while PUFA’s are not, view olive oil at worst as a neutral oil, since it’s mostly MUFA with just a tiny percentage of PUFA.

Likewise, butter is a great option for many items that require fat, especially baked goods. When I’ve looked at the ingredients of baked goods at my local Whole Foods they invariably list canola and not butter, although very occasionally I will see something that doesn’t have it – for example a pound cake I picked up last night. Of course, butter is relatively high in SFA and so for the traditionalists who still believe in the diet-heart hypothesis (that SFA’s increase cholesterol levels and that increased cholesterol levels increase coronary heart disease risk factors) despite lots of evidence that refutes this theory, it isn’t acceptable. Similarly the tropical oils that used to be used a great deal in baking had their reputations tarnished (I believe wrongly) because of the whole saturated fat scare of the 80’s and 90’s. Only in the last 10 or so years are we starting to see reports about how some of the fatty acids in these oils can actually be heart-protective.

Even if we just concentrate on olive oil as the least controversial alternative, it is a lot more expensive than canola, and there’s the rub. If it wasn’t for this factor, we might be seeing a lot more olive oil in Whole Foods’ prepared foods. As it is Whole Foods charges a premium for their food, and using olive oil would probably make their food that much more expensive. At this point, though, I don’t even have the option of buying most of their prepared foods because I don’t care to consume canola oil. So Whole Foods is losing sales because they’ve made it too hard for me to buy lunch there, given the small number of options that don’t contain added canola.

Sadly, few people care enough about this stuff to be aware that there’s anything controversial about canola, and others simply won’t believe that there’s enough evidence to implicate it in health issues. I contend, though, that the people who pay a premium at Whole Foods for presumably healthy food are probably more aware of the controversy and more likely to use that as a factor when making buying decisions. Still, I think this issue needs a lot more exposure. Optimally, I should be preparing all the food I eat myself, of course, but being a busy parent this isn’t always possible, and I would like to not be so constrained in my choices when going to a store that is supposed to be carrying products that are healthful…

http://blog.treonauts.com/2008/01/more-treo-800w.html?utm_source=tnemail&utm_medium=daily

2007 was a busy year for me personally. My daughter turned two, and rapidly demanded more attention as she became totally super-mobile as well as agile enough to climb tables, leap tall buildings, or at least cushions with a single bound, etc.

I also started a new job in 2007 where I’ve been kept very busy. Previous jobs have almost all had some serious downtimes, especially the job previous to my current one. The business at work means I’m sometimes working late and/or on the weekends. Since many of my previous jobs were for government contracts where you really couldn’t work overtime, this is definitely different!

But the blogging bug has been gnawing at me for a while. I’ve actually been keeping my writing going by participating in a number of discussion forums, and a recent reply to a message asking me if I was a professional writer (incredibly flattering to someone who’s never had a piece of writing printed other than a couple of college paper editorials!) has given me that much more motivation to get this thing back on the tracks again. I really want to put some thoughts down here and there if only in a paragraph or two. Unfortunately - or perhaps fortunately for some of my readers - the long tomes you may encounter by viewing the archives here probably will not occur again, or only on very rare occasion. I’m going to attempt, however, to at least start scribbling down a disjointed thought or two on a more regular basis - well, hell, on ANY basis – and we’ll see what happens.

I did feel like I needed to write SOME kind of intermediate message, though, explaining my absence for over a year, so here it is.

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

The first section of the book details industrial agriculture. Specifically, it describes everything about the biggest single crop that the U.S. produces - corn, or more accurately the species zea mays. The history of corn is a fascinating one as Pollan tells it. He describes how in the last fifty or so years it has become part of an absurdist spiral that has bankrupted huge numbers of farmers, made the U.S. one of the most obese countries on the planet, and has usurped the vast majority of our arable land. Most of this, Pollan writes, is due to government subsidies that compel farmers to grow corn over anything else. Government regulations also favor corn, industrial methods of farming, and the largest of operations. These regulations are no doubt affected by the lobbying dollars spent, and campaign contributions given, to government officials on behalf of the manufacturers of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and huge industrial farms.

Corn has become such a cheap commodity, Pollan tells us, that new ways are constantly being devised to deal with the ever-increasing yields and surpluses that would otherwise rot on the silo floor. So corn goes into all processed foods for various purposes - bulking, sweetening, preserving, or adding this or that quality. Sweetening, of course, is one of its main functions, as high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) found in soft drinks and desert foods and in many other non-desert foods that one wouldn’t expect it to be in. The escalating consumption of soft drinks with HFCS has been proposed by many as a major causal factor in the U.S. epidemic of obesity and diabetes - especially childhood diabetes.

In addition to corn, Pollan also tracks a steer he purchases that will eventually be slaughtered in a factory farm, or has the industry calls it, a Confined Area Feeding Operation, of CAFO. The steer gets to have a happy few weeks with his mother, eating a natural diet of grass, after which he is shipped to the CAFO and subsequently made to eat a completely unnatural diet of corn, soy protein, and the fat from fellow slaughtered cows. Corn is the carbohydrate of choice, of course, because it is so cheap, but also because it fattens the cow very quickly (not unlike how it fattens us), and produces the marbling affect that the USDA uses one of its two main variables in how it rates rate cuts of meat. Such cows are routinely given antibiotics as part of their regular diet due to the unsanitary conditions of the industrial feed lot as well as their unnatural diet. They are also pumped full of hormones to speed their growth even more.

Aside from the humanitarian, health, and economic issues involved, there is even one of geopolitics. This is because industrial farming is based around petroleum, and according to Pollan accounts for 20% of the United States energy expenditure! Not only does this industrial system involve shipping food products across the vast distances of our country, but the fertilizer itself requires a great deal of petroleum to produce. While technology like genetically modified organisms and new farming methods have made the yield per acre of corn very high indeed, the efficiency of producing it in terms of resources needed is still low. According to Pollan, it takes something like 50 calories of energy (mostly from oil) to produce a single food calorie from corn. Of course, all this government subsidizing, and hence cheapening of corn, means that corn and the animals raised on it have become much cheaper to eat. But, Pollan argues, there is a tremendous hidden cost, or costs, the two major ones being public health and our increased dependency on foreign oil.

The second part of the book is devoted to “industrial organic.” This might seem like a contradiction in terms and Pollan argues that this may be the case. He describes the origins of the organic movement in the 60’s and 70’s and how part of the tenets of the movement was about “sustainability” - the ability for a farm to sustain itself without a significant amount of outside “inputs” - chemical fertilizer, pesticides, etc.) The first farms of this movement grew haltingly, but eventually took off, mainly in the 1980’s, after which their products were in such high demand by national chains like Costco that their demand could not be bet via the original ideals of organic movement. So a more “industrial” approach was adopted. Still, neither the animal feed nor the crops grown for human consumption via industrial organic can use chemical fertilizers or pesticides. Antibiotics can only be used in case of an illness rather than as a preventative, and hormones cannot be used at all. While this takes care of many of the problems of pure industrial farming, it does not deal with the problem of sustainability that was a major part of the movement’s initial focus.

The third part of the book centers around the self-labeled “beyond organic,” movement, which aims to reinvent the original movement’s ideals, although some of its origins hark back even further to the 1940’s, when industrial farming was really starting to get started, and chemical fertilizers and pesticides were starting to be used. The movement preaches sustainability and imitating nature in the closest way possible within the confines of a managed system. The practice is exemplified by the colorful farmer Joel Salatin in his 100-acre farm in Swoope, Virginia, about two and a half hours west of me here in the Washington DC suburbs. Salatin has been a tireless crusader for the rights of small farmers like himself, who are often given the short end of the stick because they do not have the lobbying dollars of the industrial organic sector, let alone the non-organic industrial. Pollan actually spends a week working at Salatin’s farm, “Polyface ,” for a week, involved in many of the aspects of farming, even including the slaughtering of chickens. As Pollan describes it, just about everything at Polyface is sustainable. The Cows graze on a given pasture and fertilize it with their manure, then they are moved to another pasture and chickens are brought in as a “clean up crew” eating the larva that has been growing in the manure. The chickens in turn deposit their own waste, and in another day or two the grass has grown back to the point where another group of cows can be brought in to feed. This cycle where different plants and animals participate in a system that helps all involved without the need for external materials or forces (except the farmer to move the animals) is such a huge savings in terms of fuel, raw materials, etc., that one can really see how incredibly wasteful the industrial systems are in comparison.

The final part of the book concerns itself with Pollan’s efforts to make a meal that he has hunted and gathered himself. A friend mentors him both in hunting feral pigs as well as finding wild mushrooms. Much of this portion of the book is devoted to Pollan’s own philosophical and moral meanderings about whether he can justify killing an animal and eating it. Pollan corresponds with Peter Singer, author of Animal Liberation , and has debate both with Singer and with himself about whether eating meat is justifiable. He does end up going on his hunt, and we get to experience the exhilaration that this brings, as well as the disgust when it comes time to dress his kill. Foraging for mushrooms, does not elicit any moral dilemmas, but does provide some interesting information about an organism completely separate from both that of the animal and plant kingdoms, and one which we apparently know comparatively little about.

On the whole, The Omivore’s Dilemma is a fascinating book that will make many people rethink their entire relationship with food. The vast majority of us think little about food other than perhaps the cost, the calorie content, the taste, and occasionally the number of grams of fat or carbohydrate contained in it. This book provides some great insights into aspects of the food chain that most of us know little about, perhaps enough to prompt those who read it to start thinking and caring how the food on their plate got there enough to ask more questions about that food, be it from a grocery store or a restaurant. Perhaps some will even start to demand more from the restaurants and food shops they patronize. And perhaps some will even ask themselves more about what they are willing to sacrifice in an effort to eat what they think will be healthy for them, the country, and the planet.

As much as I enjoyed The Omnivore’s Dilemma, I did have a couple of problems with the book, and I’m apparently not alone, given some of the reviews on Amazon.com . Let me first mention that I listened to this book as an audio book downloaded from Audible.com , so my experience is, I’m sure. slightly different from those reading the book in paper form. Nonetheless, one of the main complaints about the book I would have to agree with - I think Pollan could have gotten his point across within 3/4 of the pages it actually took, perhaps even less. The first parts about industrial non-organic, and industrial organic, are very informational. In the third part, Pollan puts himself into the story, which in itself is fine and gives us some of his personal insights by letting us experience what he did on the farm, but at a certain point, especially around the issues of killing, Pollan becomes so entangled in his own conflicting emotions and tortured thinking about it, that eventually gets repetitive and you feel like you are reading the diary of a tortured soul. This continues and perhaps even worsens in the final part of the book, where Pollan debates vegetarianism with himself and with Singer, tries to deal with the guilt over having fun while hunting and killing his pig and his revulsion during the dressing of the animal. Although these moral musings aren’t prevalent in the chapters on hunting for mushrooms, Pollan seems to find other things to wax philosophic about, fluffing the pages out way beyond what they should be, especially at the end of a long book.

Aside from the length issue and some inaccuracies and inconsistencies pointed out by other reviewers on Amazon, my other major issue with Pollan’s book is one that might not be an issue for most. It relates to Pollan’s ridicule of restricted carbohydrate diets - Atkins in particular - and disdain for fat in general and saturated fat in particular. I find it disappointing that Pollan can debunk so much of the standard line about food, even about the “organic” label that marketers would have you believe is the healthiest food there can be, yet he seems to accept all the old dogma about low-carb and saturated fats despite there being tremendous evidence that supports the healthfulness of that way of eating. Instead he more or less calls Atkins a “quack” and bases this, it seems, on the oft-repeated erroneous claim that Atkins eliminates an “entire food group” - by which he means carbohydrates. This of course is incorrect, but Pollan, like many, seem to have a bias against diets, and specifically towards Atkins that clouds objectivity and careful research. This bias seems to infect other ideas of Pollan’s. The most blatant example of this bias (perhaps also combined with some sloppiness that Pollan shows elsewhere when dealing with other technical subjects) is when he claims that the human brain can get glucose only from carbohydrates. Any first-year biochemist will tell you that this is false, and that protein can easily be converted to glucose as well - Eskimos have survived for hundreds of years on a diet of pure protein and fat (from seal and caribou) for hundreds of years.

Finally, as at least one Amazon reviewer points out, Pollan doesn’t really fully deal with the issue of the price of doing things in an organic and sustainable way. Organic, and “beyond organic” foods are generally much higher in price than their conventional competition. That’s not to say they aren’t worth that price for those who can afford them, but Wholefoods, CSA’s, and Farmers Markets are often more patronized by those on the upper end of the income scale. Those who make minimum wage, or even a bit more, would probably have to spend a huge portion of their paycheck in order to buy most of their food as organic. They simply don’t have much choice in the matter. Pollan suggests that Pollyface’s customers didn’t seem like the well-healed customers of Wholefoods. Still, Swoope is a pretty rural part of Virginia, and so those more well-to-do people just aren’t there in large numbers, and those who are probably are not trying to stand out as such.

Theoretically if the government would stop subsidizing corn and instead used that money to support small sustainable farmers so that their food could be sold less expensively and locally(but without the regulatory requirements that often come with such funding), the food supply might be turned on its head. This of course, is a pipe dream. I’d love for it to happen, but how practical is it in a country as large as ours? Can all the farmland be reconverted into lots of Polyfaces that could serve the entire country? Even if it could be done, the monumental market forces needed for getting this change to occur just aren’t there. It would take a huge rethinking on the part of most of citizens of this country about the food they eat. Even if everyone read Pollan’s book (which I don’t think is a bad idea), there would still be plenty of hold outs who simply don’t care about their own health, let alone the health of others, the environment, or the health and well-being of the animals they eat. I think the best we can hope for, at least for the foreseeable future, is just a level playing field, where small farmers are given the same rights and opportunities as the giant industrial ones and still get to produce their crops and livestock in the way they choose with as little regulation from the government as possible. This is all that Joel Salatin wants, according to Pollan, and I don’t think it’s something unreasonable to ask for, even from those who couldn’t care less about “organic,” “beyond organic,” or any other fancy label we might choose to give our food in the future.

Reading Garlic and Sapphires wasn’t quite like a trip down memory lane, since so many of the restaurants were the very high-priced ones that we never ate at growing up, or they were simply restaurants that were established after I left the city or that I’d never happen to patronize. The one exception to this was Windows on the World, the restaurant atop the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers. I went a few times back in the 80’s for special occasions, but only for brunch, which I believe was much cheaper than their dinner menu. Also, as Reichl explains, Windows On the World was renovated and received a new chef and emphasis after the first World Trade Center bombing in the early 90’s. So for all practical purposes I ate at a different restaurant.

Despite the fact that I have little chance of eating in most of the establishments described in the book, it was wonderful, as a foodie, to listen to Reichl describe in poetic detail how various foods would melt in her mouth, revealing layers upon layers of different, sometimes subtle, sometimes very blatant flavors. Reichl also gives us many of her own recipes (she was a chef and co-owned a restaurant in Berkeley in the 70’s), some of which sound great. The book is also nice for those simply interested in New York City, as Reichl describes a good deal of it - not just the restaurants - in this book.

But this isn’t just a book about food or restaurants. It’s also one about human nature. Reichl describes at the beginning of the book how she’s spotted by someone who works for a restaurant on one of her first flights to New York when she is preparing to move. She’s told that every restaurant in New York probably has her picture taped inside the kitchen with a reward for spotting her. Because of this, she decides she will enlist the help of an old acting-teacher friend of her mother’s to create new identities. She is given wigs and makeup and different clothing to transform herself into everything from a sexy blond divorcee to a meek, impoverished older lady, to even a replica of her own brash and demanding mother. She uses these disguises to try to understand how others may experience the same meal. And she discovers that, as we expect, that restaurants (especially the high-end ones) do play favorites and discriminate quite liberally in how they provide service to different people, and even whether they will permit someone to patronize their establishment.

Along with exploring how waiters and other diners react to her in her various disguises, she also has revelations about herself. She admits to being able to assume particular personas very easily. It’s almost as if she is channeling different aspects of her personality, some of which may be well hidden and seldom seen. Through this she has some self-discoveries and eventually decides to leave her post at the Times.

We also get to read about various political maneuverings within the Times, stories about her husband and son, and about coworkers and friends who accompany her to restaurants. There are also memorable parts where she is both fooling the restaurant, but also fooling her guests, who are unaware of whom she really is.

In general, I found it a very enjoyable read. There were times where I thought she might be exaggerating some things for effect, or even making some stuff up (they just seemed too “perfect” or “predictable” in a kind of theatrical way), but for the most part these were few and far between.

I actually listened to an unabridged audio version of this book via Audible.com which has various plans allowing you to purchase full, unabridged versions of a huge-selection of books (many best-sellers) for as little as $6 each, and download them for immediate listening either on your computer or onto a large selection of compatible players (including iPods). Bernadette Dunne does a good job of narrating the book and I don’t recall any pronunciation errors in all the descriptions of food, restaurants, or place names in New York. Although I will admit I didn’t care for her rendition of Reichl’s young son. Reichl also narrates an abridged version of the book if you’d like to hear the author read her own book, New York accent and all. The book is available in print as well, of course.

More recently, I’ve been trying to get more exercise in during the day, and since it’s been so nice and unseasonably warm here this week, I decided to skip lunch and just walk around the neighborhood. I was wondering how much I walked, but other than the amount of time and a vague sense of how fast I was going, I really couldn’t gauge much. So I thought I’d start looking for something akin to what I’ve described above and maybe, just maybe I’d find something. Well, I was shocked that I found something perfect almost immediately!

Gmaps Pedometer is the site/hack, and it is great for anyone just wanting to know how far it is from one point to another on a map, to someone who wants to get detailed information for a walking program, a cycling route, etc. You can very easily create a walking path and Gmaps Pedometer will show you dynamically not only what the distance is, but even how many calories you will burn on this path. I’m not sure about how accurate the calorie count is, though, since my 3-mile path I created around my office was rated at 368 calories, which seems a bit high. Gmaps Pedometer even gives you a graphic of the elevation levels your path is traversing, but as much as I’d like to believe it, I don’t believe elevation is taken into account for calories. The only forum message from the author about this on the site mentions not wanting to use the elevation markers for anything else because elevation data is not available everywhere - it seems to be available mostly for the U.S.

If you can time your walk, and Gmaps Pedometer gives you an accurate measurement of the distance, you can figure out your speed and then you can plug that, the time, and your weight into some other tool to get a more or less accurate representation of you calories burned. I tried to find such a calculator on the web, but all the ones out will only let you plug in pre-specified numbers for your pace, like 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, etc. mph. I did find one shareware application you can download that does seem to have the degree of flexibility I was hoping for.

In addition to what I’ve mentioned so far, Gmaps Pedometer also lets you save a given route, so for example, this is one route I created . Also, it lets you export to GPX format with a third party bookmarklet . GPX is a format for sharing GPS data, so potentially you could load this into your GPS and use it as a way to navigate. This might be very valuable for hikers, or just walkers or cyclists who are unfamiliar with an area and want to make sure they are taking the right path. Theoretically, one could use Gmaps Pedometer to design city walking tours and make those available for people to download, along with a set of MP3’s for each of the points of interest on the path. Really, the possibilities are endless with this thing!

Generally, what I have found is that there are three or four basic types of computer book. You have books geared towards absolute beginners which walk you through every little step, every mouse click, over and over again ad nauseum. Then you have books geared towards programmers, which are written in such a way that if you don’t have a formal knowledge of this subject, you will probably eventually get a lost. Of course for those without any programming experience or knowledge, these books will quickly go over one’s head. Most of these books are about a particular facet of a programming language or environment, but some are exhaustive studies of everything, almost to the point that they are reference books themselves. Finally, there are reference books, which sometimes double as instructional texts as I intimated, and sometimes are simply streight-forward information about the various features and functions of a given language or system.

Teach Yourself ASP.Net 2.0 in 24 Hours, of course, fits into the first category - that of one geared towards beginners. I often wish there were books that kind of bridged the gaps between beginners and more experienced programmers, and occasionally there are, but they are few and far between. What I have in mind is something that walks you through some fundamentals at least initially, but soon stops repeating the same steps, challenging you to remember them yourself, and also getting into some of the more advanced aspects a little. Teach Yourself ASP.Net 2.0 in 24 Hours doesn’t do this. That being said, it’s still a good book for what it’s for. You just need to understand it’s target reader so that if you have experience programming, you can just skip the repetitive parts, or parts that you already know (control structures, conditional statements, html markup, etc.).

Like many in the field of web development (at least those of us who’ve been at it for close to 10 years or more), I came to it without formal study. When I started, there were no books on html, let alone classes on it. Through the years I taught myself how to program in more sophisticated ways using Perl, then Cold Fusion, JavaScript, and ASP. But while I understand how to use all these tools to create dynamic websites, I’m not sure if I have the same “programmer mentality” that I see in others who mastered C++ or Java in college, high school, or even earlier! In my opinion there’s a kind of middle-tier market out there of those of us who came to programming in adulthood, too late to substantially effect how our brains work. We can understand programming, but are not “native speakers.” We can program, but books written “for programmers” can still start to sound like Greek if we don’t concentrate hard and perhaps reread some sentences a few times!

In any case, Scott Mitchell’s book is a good start for anyone like myself, or those who are just starting out in the field and want to gain some familiarity with what .Net is about. It will take you through many of the things you will do as a developer in creating dynamic sites - including connecting with back-end databases, form validation, file uploads, site navigation, and more. You will not get much understanding about the Visual Basic or C# languages used to manipulate business logic or to do more advanced stuff with data binding, etc. But for me at least this was a good primer before going on to read more advanced books and reference guides about ASP.Net 2.0. I think it created a great “bridge” between my familiarity with plain old ASP and what I know is going to be a much more powerful and deep environment to program websites in.

The other nice thing about this book is that it comes with Microsoft’s “Express” edition of their Visual Web Developer 2005. This is basically a paired down version of the Visual Studio software that is used by professionals not only to build ASP.Net websites, but also to develop stand-alone Windows applications. However, this will let you develop any ASP.Net website and test it locally on your machine - it comes with a version of Microsoft’s SQL Server Database, and a web server. You can easily take the files you develop on it and upload them to a hosted server on the internet or a corporate intranet server behind a firewall, etc. You can download this software for free from Microsoft, but it’s nice having the CD that you can use to do a quick install and avoid having to go find it and download it from MS’s site, especially if you don’t have a fast Internet connection.

Sarah Vowel has written several books, and this latest one repeats some of the same themes of American history that her previous book, A Partly Cloudy Patriot, started. Vowel is a self-proclaimed “history geek” and also presidential-assassination-obsessed. A lot of what she wrote about in the past was about personal experiences, and that is what she talked about on the radio as well. In this book, too, there is a lot of this. It’s not just an historical text, but also partially an autobiographical journey with Vowel to various places of historical significance where she interacts with the tour guides and other tourists, and also the friends that she drags grudgingly to almost every one.

I listened to an unabridged audio version of it via Audible.com, which has various plans allowing you to purchase full, unabridged versions of a huge-selection of books (many best-sellers) for as little as $6 each, and download them for immediate listening either on your computer or onto a large selection of compatible players (including iPods). If you’ve ever heard Vowel speak, you know she has a very distinct voice. You may have even heard her without knowing - she played Violet (the daughter) in the animated movie The Incredibles. It’s high and nasaly, which you would never think would be something you’d want to listen to for 7 hours, and yet at least some of us find this voice strangely hypnotic. I’ve heard her speak a couple of times in DC, once as part of a live This American Life, and a second time as just herself. The second time, she was late. She doesn’t drive, and so was taking the train up from her home in New York City. The train lost power. The woman handling the show was talking to her on her cell phone while she was rushing from the train station in a cab and actually put the phone up to the microphone. Sarah managed to keep us laughing and still did a great job once she got there in person. It’s a testament to her appeal that 99% of the audience stayed over an hour after she was supposed to be there for her to arrive. The book is available in print as well, of course.

Vowel’s dry humor runs throughout Assasination Vacation, catching on oh so many ironic twists of history, so many outlandish actions or quotes that they seem downright hilarious sometimes. She also repeatedly pokes fun at herself for her peculiar geekiness about historical minutiae, her morbid fascinations, and her various allergies and phobias. The book contains not only her own voice, but also that of a number of others - actors, writers, comedians - who ad a little spice to the mix. They recite quotes from the principal characters - presidents and assassins alike. Included are Steven King, John Stewart, Conan O’Brian, and Brad Bird (whom I think was my favorite as Garfield assassin Charles Guiteau).

While I enjoyed listening to the book, and believe I picked up some knowledge from it, I’m afraid that as with most books about history, I will soon forget many details (if I haven’t already). Even with the fairly narrow subject matter, there are still lots of facts involved with each assassination, not to mention a bunch of background information about the lives of each president and their various family members, friends, colleagues, and of course their assassins and co-conspirators. Also included is information on the wars, scandals, and other events that took place before or during the time of a given president. Of course Vowel makes a lot of this stuff more memorable by adding her own humor and passion for the subject, which makes it more memorable, but I still think many of the details will slip away despite this. Then again, this isn’t a history text, but more a kind of biographical/autobiographical journey through a few singular parts of history, as well as a journey in the present day to some of the odd memorials and museums for both the presidents and the assassins - ranging from the high reaches of the Adirondack mountains to Fort Jefferson on the Dry Tortugas, a small tropical island 70 miles west of Key West, where the Gulf of Mexico meets the Caribbean.

That being said, while I certainly enjoyed Assassination Vacation, I personally preferred A Partly Cloudy Patriot. Either book is a great listen from my viewpoint, and this latest one kind of follows from the last. I also think that this book might grow on you and slowly infect you with at least a little of that same geeky obsession for these assassinations that Vowel has herself. Then again, while I’m a geek, I’m not much of a history geek, and so I’m not sure I’ll have the dedication (or time) to devote to something as relatively arcane as 19th Century U.S. presidential assassinations!

I would say a majority of the book is about language and specifically about euphemisms, which Carlin finds repugnant, because they “water down” the language and make a lot of things “meaningless” by couching them in kinder sounding words or phrases that don’t impart truth or real meaning. There’s a lot of truth to this, but Carlin does belabor the point, and after a while I was starting to say, “Ok, I get the point already!”

He also has a lot of these little “skits” where he will make up a conversation among a couple of people. Some of these are funny, some aren’t. A lot are graphic, gross, “dirty” or in various ways the opposite of “political correctness.” As I said, he definitely is out to try to offend just about anyone.

There’s also some insightful stuff about politics, the irony of various political issues, how politicians are constantly trying to deceive us, and a lot of times doing so by use of language.

Of course there’s a lot about various things, not all language-related, that simply piss Carlin off. Some of these are just silly and obviously not to be taken seriously, some are things that most of us would probably find annoying, or at least will once Carlin enlightens us as to why they are so dumb.

I’ve mainly seen Carlin in some older stand-up routines, a couple of movies, and one other book, Napalm and Silly Puddy, so I don’t know if I’m familiar enough with his stuff to comment on how this book compares to earlier work. It was an interesting listen, one with some laugh-out-lound moments, no doubt, but also some interesting thoughts, and a lot of expounding on random stuff that made it a bit repetitive. I wonder if for books like this, a very strategic audio abridgement might actually make it a much more solid listen?

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Password:

In the last few months, however, there have been numerous controversies possibly due to the increasing popularity of Digg.com. First there was talk about how the top 100 users of Digg submitted more than half of the stories, and so had more influence than the rest of the community who could not spend 10 hours a day submitting stories.

More recently there has been a slew of commentary on how Digg’s system for dealing with duplicate entries has been breaking down. This most recent one got to Digg’s front page and generated a huge amount of comments.

Personally, I’ve found the duplication problem getting worse. I used to go to Digg and it would take me a while to get through just the first page of stories, so much so that I often didn’t even get to the second page. But more and more, I’ve been going to the second, third, and fourth pages. Part of this is due to articles on things I’m just not interested in, but a lot is due to repetition.

I’ve also been trying to submit articles here and there and when I do searches before submitting I sometimes find not one or two, but half a dozen or more articles on the exact same news item. And these weren’t even items in the top (and up until recently only) category on Digg, technology.

The problem, I think, lies what gave Digg its initial power - that “social” in “social bookmarking. People are submitting articles so that they are dugg and recognized by others, be they friends or strangers. It’s been called “ego” but whatever you call it, it worked well when there were fewer people because the chance that you were creating a dupe was not as high. Now that Digg is so popular, chances are that if a story has only been out for an hour, it’s already been submitted. I think this makes some people desperate (since they can’t find good articles that haven’t been dug) and so they don’t search for duplicates and ignore Digg’s own warning that their story might be one.

Digg’s other tools to prevent duplication don’t seem to be working either. One can mark an article as a duplicate, but what isn’t clear is how many of such actions it takes for the duplicate to be removed, or if they are removed at all? It must be a lot because we still see many of these. One can comment in the article itself that it’s a duplicate, but chances are this won’t do anything, other than possibly getting your own comment “dugg down” meaning that your overall rank on Digg goes down.

The problem seems to stem from the idea that people want to be recognized as being special, and that this impulse has superceded the idea of making Digg a better place for the community at large. I think part of this has to do with what’s probably a fairly young demographic at Digg, and we all know that when we were young, we tended to think about ourselves a little more than when we got older and realized the world didn’t revolve around us. Then again, there are plenty of people for whom age has not meant added wisdom in this area! Anyway, you can be recognized on Digg in at least a couple of different ways. You can do this in a couple of ways on Digg. One is to have a high ranking of diggs; the second is to get a story you submitted onto the front page.

If we agree that the motivation is simply to get recognition, then I think the only way to solve the issue is to remove this recognition. Otherwise, people will always figure out ways to “game” the system, and given a finite number of new things happening every day, and new articles published on the web, people will simply post duplicates hoping that they can some how pump up their ranking and get their submission on the home page by getting their friends to digg it, or creating duplicate accounts, etc. But how do you remove recognition from a social site like Digg.com?

Well, one way to do it is to make the ranking system specific to the person ranking you. So, for example, if I rank X as being digger whose articles I think are reliable and like to read, then I give them a digg, and if I think they are obnoxious, then I “bury” them (give them a negative digg). But my ratings are only for me. They don’t get posted anywhere else, save at most on my profile page, but maybe not even there. The point is, that removing the ranking removes one of the purely selfish reasons for people to submit stories. You could also opt to make invisible those stories that have been submitted by users who you’ve previously buried, and highlight stories of those you’ve dugg. Or simply have a color-coding scheme to easily pick out the buried users’ stories from the dugg users’ stories and all the rest. As for users overall ranking, I think Digg could still tally this, but it would only be for their internal use. Possibly, people could see their own rankings, but not those of others.

The second idea is to remove credit to the person who posted a story as soon as it goes on the front page. That way, no one could say - “hey look, my story was posted to the front page, aren’t I great? Love me!” However, you could still be dugg or buried by a given user, so your articles might be seen by more or less people depending on how reliable you are.

Whether these suggestions or something else entirely are adopted, I think the problem needs to be addressed by Digg. We are now seeing “duplicates” submissions of articles about duplicates! And this blog entry itself is contributing, of course! Kevin Rose or Jay Adelson, the founders of Digg, need to come out and talk about the issue, be it on Digg, or wherever, or if not talk, then simply do something. The latest news is about how they are in negotiations now to sell Digg, so this issue, even though it seems to be escalating daily, may not be the first thing on their minds! If Digg is sold to a large company like News Corp, or another, the problem may get worse before it gets better. Then again, if we see a massive influx of cash, these guys may have the resources to get their programmers some reinforcements to make some necessary changes.