1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

American Idol 3

Posted by Levi on Jan 21st, 2004
2004
Jan 21

Having avoided the first two instances of this very popular show, I somehow have managed to catch the first two episodes of their first season. Although entertaining on a certain level, I don’t know how many more of these “audition” shows I can take. So much is repetitive. Most of it is just people getting up on stage and trying to sing. I guess people who are tone deaf cannot tell that they sound hidious. Ok, some of them are so horrible it’s funny, but after a while, it’s like… I get the point! People just can’t tell. There’s nothing inherently funny about that. It’s like thinking it’s funny that a blind man can’t tell his tie is crooked, or that some hair is sticking up, or something. You’re basically making fun of people because of a disability. What this indicates to me is a couple of things: 1) people can’t tell others to their face that they can’t sing, and 2) when someone ELSE does it, a lot of people get kicks out of this. I know it’s supposed to be entertaining, but really is it necessary to mock these people? Simon and Randy take turns trying to insult the person, and laugh at them. Randy Jackson is supposedly a music producer with 20 years of experience in the industry. But his comments are bafoonish! His complements are so general that I could have come up with them. Stuff like “you have an interesting voice” and “you’re fun” is as intricate as he gets. Then he yells out to those who end up passing in a silly voice “welcome to hollywood, baby!” He seems more of a clown than someone who has actual experience with this stuff. Half the time he seems to defer to Simon or Paula so that he will not stand out as having an opinion very different from the other two. Sorry for the rant, but these are my first impressions. I don’t know whether I will continue to watch the show or not, I suppose if I’m cooking or something and happen to have the tv on in the background, that’s the best chance!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Bloomberg Brave or Stupid?

Posted by Levi on Jan 21st, 2004
2004
Jan 21

It’s been a good 11 or 12 years since I actually called New York City “home” so I haven’t followed Bloomberg as a mayor. A recent piece by the 24-hour local news station NY1, however, just came to my attention. In the article, Bloomberg, who is noted as an avid jogger and someone who eschews high-calorie foods, ridicules the infamous Dr. Robert C. Atkins, going so far as to call into question the actual cause of his death. Stuart Trager, currently the media frontman for the Atkins Diet, wondered if it were a joke. I wonder too. This is something I might have expected from Howard Stern, but from the mayor of a metropolis? Ok, perhaps Marion Barry, former mayor of my current home town, has said much more outlandish things, but Bloomberg is not a drug addict, at least as far as we know.

Some of you out there who have similar proclivities to Bloomberg’s may actually be applauding his forthrightness. Perhaps he is brave to speak his mind, but I think there is a fair degree of stupidity mixed in with this. Millions of Americans (and New Yorkers) are on the Atkins diet or on similar low-carb regimes. By insulting their patron saint, he has immediately alienated all these people! That’s not very smart politicking! It’s one thing if Bloomberg has actual concerns about the health issues surrounding low-carb, but his comments don’t make him sound very educated about the subject, they actually make him sound like someone who has a personal aversion to fat in food, a low-fat fanatic who entertains conspiracy theories because the fact that eating fat might actually be healthy for you doesn’t jive with his view of the world.

Of course I am coming at it from a biased point of view, but even so, with the current popularity of such plans, how can any politician rail against their modern-day popularizer and expect not to get damaged by this in some way? For Pete’s sake, they guy is dead. Maybe he had flaws (don’t we all?), and maybe you personally disagree with the guy, but he help a lot of people lose weight, was a tireless advocate for his cause, and was headquartered in New York. Bloomberg should be keeping such comments to himself, lest he be labeled as an insensitive boor. But perhaps he’s already labeled that way - I haven’t been following his mayoral career, so I don’t know…